Category Archives: History

Q-Ships and the coming Gerrymander Wars

.

In the early days of the Great War, later to be known as World War I, there existed a distinct set of rules for conducting warfare by submarines against civilian shipping. After all civilian ships are not military combat vessels and it was considered a crime to sink civilians without warning. Undersea Boat, U-Boats, were, when attacking a civilian shop, expected to surface, announce that the ship was targeted to be sunk, and provide the crew and passengers time to abandon the ship in their lifeboats, and once that evolution had been completed, then the sub would sink the vessel. All very proper and civilized warfare.

England, an island nation, quickly discovered that losing tons of shipping weighed heavily on both their economy and their population. They took drastic action to save their crucial shipping, inventing the Q-ship. A Q-ship, converted from a standard commercial vessel, boasted deck guns that could be hidden from view. (And the reason the department of hidden and special gadgets is known as Q-branch.) Once an enemy U-boat surfaced and made its intention to attack known, the hidden guns would be deployed and the submarine sunk. Imperial Germany responded rationally and stopped providing civilian ships with any warning, sinking them on sight in unrestricted submarine warfare, pushing the United States of America to enter the war.

When the sequel war came about no nation attempted restricted submarine warfare, instead sinking enemy vessels of every type without warning or mercy – evidence that any standard or norm once abandoned is forever lost.

The Constitution of the United States requires that every decade the federal government performs a census and based upon that the congressional districts for the House of Representatives are drawn.

In 2003 after the Republicans gained full control of the government of Texas, they sought to replace the district maps that had been drawn following the 2000 census, breaking the norm of only redrawing the districts each decade. Democratic members of the Texas government even fled the state in an attempt to deny a quorum and prevent the redrawing of the lines but ultimately failed to kill the scheme. In 2006 the mid-decade redistricting got the seal of approval from the US Supreme court when they interpreted the constitution as requiring a redistricting every ten years but not forbidding it at other times. Further exacerbating the issues of congressional districts is a pair of Supreme Court decisions, 2019’s call that the issue of drawing lines for partisan purposes lies beyond the scope of Federal courts to address and this year’s call that the Voting Rights Act doesn’t require majority-minority districts throws open the season for unrestricted gerrymandering warfare. Districts drawn to advantage one political party that just happen as a side-effect disadvantage any particular racial group are now perfectly constitutional.

As with submarine warfare a civilized norm once abandoned is dead. With early votes in the primary already cast, Louisiana is seeking to redraw their districts to eliminate Democratic seats and states with Democratic trifectas are speaking of drawing lines that eliminate every Republican seat within their states.

I despise the current and proposed gerrymanders, but I am also a realist and understand that the current Republican party, headed by a vainglorious buffoon who hates above all things being held in the slightest manner accountable will never ever reach a consensus to ban the offensive practice of politicians picking their voters. The only hope that exists is for the GOP to lose their hold on the Federal government and for the Democrats, should they hold all three branches in 2029, be forced, and they will have to be forced because like the ring of power having the seats is powerfully seductive, to fix this with Federal laws.

Share

The Post-War World is Passing Away

.

And not even the wisest can know what world is being born.

It is a testament to the power of the order that emerged following the Second World War that the term ‘post-war’ is instantly understood with no confusion as to which war is being referred even as that war, its evils, its heroism, and its terrible cost, passes out of living memory. Soon there will be none alive for whom that global struggle is a memory, and it will live only in textbooks, documentaries, and retold narratives. More importantly, the structures erected following the war are now beginning to crumble.

A lot of the destruction of that world order, one that had been laid upon a foundation of law, both national and international, and alliances can be laid at the feet of Donald J. Trump and his backwards, idiotic, and vainglorious mentality. A man who meets the clinical criteria for malignant narcissism coupled with the intelligence of a stunted teenager and the morals of a grifting carnival barker should have never risen to occupy the most important post on Earth. He did not achieve that posting by himself, no there is great culpability to be spread around, some obvious and direct, such as the men with far greater intelligences who saw their duty to the nation and set it aside for their own comfort and prosperity some not so direct, such as the reforms of the 60s that sapped the strength of political parties until they grew so weak as to be unable to fend off attacks from within. Now, with this low IQ, self-dealing, vengeful little man helming our nation’s course into the future, those institutions that have guided and safeguarded the world since the end of the war are falling like rusting relics. Trump alone did not kill off the post-war order, cultural movements around the world contributed to that, but a just, smart, and principled American president may have been able to provide the leadership in these dark times that could have saved and strengthened them, but that ship has sailed and it has sunk.

A New World Order will emerge and not I nor anyone else can know what it will be. We can hope and fight for one that is driven by law and justice and a respect for human life in all the many forms that it can take but that is far from an assured outcome. The time of change has been given to us and it is only us that will shape it into reality. It is a terrible and terrifying responsibility.

Share

That’s Not A Battleship…

So, Trump, in his boundless narcissism, has decided that the United States Navy needs battleships again, and that these should be known as ‘Trump Class’ battleships serving as the centerpiece of his golden fleet initiative.

Of course, like with nearly every single thing that comes from this man, they are not what he promises and are vaporware, produced to stroke the ego of a vain and insecure toddler.

The proposed ships are not battleships in any conventional sense of the word. Ships are rated by their displacement—that amount of water that is displaced by the vessel as it sits there floating in the ocean. The USS New Jersey fully loaded with crew, supplies and munitions displaced 61,000 tons. A destroyer, small fast and agile ships might displace as much as 9,900 tons, this proposed ‘Trump-Class Battleship,’ if it ever came into existence, is slated to displace about 35,000 tons, about half the size of an actual battleship.

The first ship to be commissioned in this proposal would be the USS Defiant, making the truth of the matter even more clear as the first ship commissioned is the lead ship and the vessel from which the class name is derived. These vaporware vessels would be Defiant Class ships, but hey we know that Trump would just love to slap his name on it before it glides down the slipway into the water. Not that it ever will, or if by happenstance it does, it will be far beyond the current presidential term and in all likelihood this president’s life expectancy.

What these deranged fantasies expose is that Trump, a dim-witted and ignorant man, is fixated on navies that haven’t actually mattered in over a century.

The last major war where battleships dominated the seas was World War I. By the next world war, the battleships lost their throne as monarchs of the seas to the aircraft carrier. Beyond delivering massive shore bombardment, battleships serve little purpose beyond being massive and terribly expensive targets.

I do wonder if we are watching the next major evolution in naval warfare as the Russian invasion of Ukraine plays out. The Black Sea fleet has been humbled and not by new sleek warships but by cheap uncrewed drones. Is perhaps the next dominant warship not something with guns that can throw shells the size of cars 20 or more miles or floating cities filled with the latest and most expensive jet fighters and pilots, but rather small fast agile vessels that can unleash hell in the manner of hundreds if not thousands of cheap hard to detect and hard to hit drones?

Either way, the man-baby that sits in the defiled Oval Office is too stupid and too vain to see it.

Share

A San Diego from Years past

.

Saturday, I spent three hours at the Central Library downtown researching the movies that played in the summer of 1984 here is San Diego. I needed specific movies and theaters beyond the major studio productions and megahits of that year. And that year had a lot of megahits, Ghostbusters, Gremlins, Star trek III, Indian Jones and The Temple of Doom and so many more, but those I can research on the internet and are far less importance to my coming novel. No, I needed the small arthouse films, and just which arthouse were in operation in my adopted hometown.

I was here in that summer. I watched many of those movies, but my memory is foggy on when in the season they player and names of those theaters that have long since shuttered their doors, hence the need to scan through rolls of microfiche looking at the newspaper ads of the day.

Man, that brought back memories. This city used to have so many movie theaters. I saw ads for movies I had nearly forgotten entirely and the old movie houses where they played.

I adore the era of streaming and the ease with which it makes it possible to watch a lot of material instead of waiting on the whims of late-night programmers, but I miss those theaters, the thrill of something wild and unexpected when you went to showing with little or no knowledge of the film and shared that discovery with a live audience.

Share

Remakes Aren’t So Terrible

.

I missed making a post yesterday. I had a dental visit, now I have two new molars, and for most of the day a somewhat sore jaw.

This past week saw a remake of the 90s cult favorite The Crow. Now, I have seen the 90’s film, it didn’t work for me, and I found it quite dull, so this remake hasn’t interested me at all. Naturally, there have been various vocal critics not wanting to see a remake of a film that was beloved to them. I can understand that. Remakes are often, particularly in this day of studio and demographic polled directed artistic decisions, inferior copies of the originals. The remake of The Day the Earth Stood Still possessed nothing of the 1950’s film’s intelligence or pointed narrative. The remake quickly fell from cultural attention and has been largely forgotten. The original remains accessible and untouched.

There are loads of badly executed remakes, Flight of the Phoenix, Poseidon vs The Poseidon Adventure, The Manchurian Candidate, King Kong and its pair of remakes. In each of these cases the remakes failed to capture the mysterious elements that made the original such classics.

All art is a product of its time. The artists and the audience are baked in the cultural over of their lives and that impressions on the art. The magic that made the classic so unforgettable is from much the years in which they were crafted as much as the people who crafted them.

So, if remakes are so often lesser movies, then why did I title this that they aren’t so bad?

Because the originals remain. Sometimes they gain new life because of the attention created by the remake. And sometimes, quite rarely, the remake becomes the new classic. The Maltese Falcon is the 3rd film adapted from the novel, but it is the 3rd film that lives on as a timeless classic while the preceding movies, who undoubtedly had their fans, fades away.

Share

August 6th, 1945

.

Today is the 79th anniversary of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima. Estimate of those killed by the attack range from 90,000 to 140,000 persons. The bombing was followed up three days later with another atomic attack on the city of Nagasaki. Despite an attempt to remove the Emperor from the throne and continue the war the militarists the twin attacks empower a faction of the government to unconditionally surrender to the Allied Powers effectively ending the Second World War.

The loss of life in the bombings is horrific and, in many minds, looms large as a terrible act that defined the ending of the Second World War. The Hiroshima mushroom cloud is often used as a visual shorthand for technological terror.

While the idea of being subjected to atomic or nuclear bombing is indeed terrifying, I find it hard to consider these attacks to the Platonic Ideal of technological murder.

Millions were killed in the holocaust. Unlike the distant impersonal slaughter that comes from dropping a bomb at enormous altitudes, whether those bombs are conventional or atomic, the murder in the camp was done close up, looking those victims in their eyes, hearing their cries and screams and was no less a product of technology than the enormous energies released by nuclear fission.

With mass production, without the industrial revolution, the ability to murder on the scale of millions simply could not exist. Without the scientific revolution and method, the Japanese barbarous experiments on helpless civilian populations with biological warfare could not exist.

The atomic bombings of those two Japanese cities cost a lot of live, but in all likelihood saved more than they killed. Japan knew the war was lost and that continuing it would only result in more and more of their people, military and civilian, being killed. They could have accepted the unconditional surrender when it was offered and avoided both atomic attacks.

Share

248 Birthdays

.

It has been 248 years since the Continental Congress adopted the Declaration of Independence. That nation born nearly two and a half centuries ago has never been far from perfect. It labor under the Absolute Evil of slavery and that has cast a long and terrible shadow across time. On the other hand, the aspirational ideals presented in that document has not only given fire to the fight against slavery and tyranny here and abroad but has severed as beacon to be our better selves.

Over the centuries we have explanted the notion about who matters and whose voices can be heard in the public square. What was once unthinkable in terms of human liberty are now enjoyed but there are more to unchain.

Recently the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) enacted a new test to determine in something was constitutional or not, the ‘history and tradition’ test. If something did not have an analog in the nation’s history or its tradition, a very slippery concept to applied fairly without biases of the head or heart, then it was in conflict with the supreme law of the land.

This is not only an invitation for personal preference to direct outcomes it is directly and thematically in opposition to our founding. A founding that proclaims that the traditions of the past do not fence in our present or future liberties. That because we have always had a king who should therefore always have a king. This nation is a bold experiment in new thinking not traditional customs.

For citizen of the United States of America this year is vitally important year. This election transcends petty policies and speaks to the very nature of the American system.

We can elect a corrupt, venal, criminal of a man who has no wish beyond his own greedy vices and appetites, throwing away two and half centuries of democratic self-governance, or we can accept that policy is less important that principal and keep him and his ilk out.

Like Klaatu said at the end of The Day the Earth Stood Still “The choice is yours.”

Share

Juneteenth: A day to Remember Dreams and Nightmares

.

June the 19th 1865 is the day the freedom loving Texans were, at the end of a rifle, forced to free the people that they had enslaved, the final state of the traitorous Confederacy to do so. It was not the end of slavery in the United States that would come officially later the same year, but it was a vital and important step along the long rocky road to freedom. A road we still stumble down.

This is a day of celebration as it was the date that the United States Army freed the enslaved peoples of Texas partially validate the great principals upon which this nation is founded. It is also the day to remember the horrific hundreds of years of nightmarish torment our nation visited up a subjugated population. Like an element in a state of quantum state that is simultaneously wave and particle America’s history is both pride and shame.

That the founders of this nation expressed all too human hypocrisy does not negate the amazing ideal that ‘all men are created equal’ nor does that bold septimate absolve them of their evils. The inspiring belief that freedom and equality are due to all people has unleashed a forced unlike any other on this planet and the failures to live up to those aspirations is a source of shame but also a motivation to do better.

Far too many people only want to think of history in one mode or another. That the centuries of slavery are an original and inescapable sin upon everything this nation has achieved, or that the evils of the past are dead and bear no relevance today. Both extremes are wrong headed.  It is the wave and particle duality again. It is both things and it is neither thing. It is the history that we must celebrate and the shame we must never forget.

Share

Another Movie Review: The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare

.

This past weekend was a two-movie weekend and after seeing Abigail on Friday evening Sunday morning me and my sweetie-wife took in Guy Ritchie’s latest film The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare. (Henceforth referred to as The Ministry.)

Lionsgate

The Ministry is a highly fictionalized retelling of Operation Postmaster and early mission by the Special Operations Executive to degrade Nazi U-boat operations in the Atlantic. The supply vessel Duchessa D’Aosta carries vital equipment and provisions for the U-boats and because the ship is in a neutral Spanish harbor off the coast of West Africa a direct military assault could bring Fascist Spain into the war on the Axis side. Instead, a very small team of disreputable agents lead by Gus March-Phillips (Henry Cavill) is sent in to destroy the ship at anchor. Operating out of uniform in in a neutral port if the teams is captured torture and death await them.

From its opening musical score and its poster art The Ministry is like a classic ‘Spaghetti Wester’ melded with a World War II action flick. The heroes all possess fantastic skills and preternatural cool. Plans go awry, the enemy is more skill and numerous that expected, schedules are disrupted and through it all March-Phillips and his team of Nazi killers remain steadfast, committed, and collected.

This is not a movie with deep social commentary or complex questions of morality, it is a romp, a fun couple of hours watching incredible competent men and women handle adversity and challenges in the manor of our fantasies. Aside from the theater’s sound system being way too loud I had a quite enjoyable time with this movie and as long as you do not go in with expectations of reality, I think you will as well.

The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare is currently playing in theaters.

Share

Masters of the Air Rekindled my Annoyance with The Eternals

.

(Minor Spoilers follow)

In the final episode of Masters of the Air Major ‘Rosie’ Rosenthal (Nate Mann) after being rescued by the Soviet Army following the crash of his B-17 sees with his own eyes a death camp that the Nazis had operated. This naturally has a massive impact on the pilot, but the scene also reawakened an irritation I had with the superhero film The Eternals.

The conceit of The Eternals is that a small group of immortal being and the source of many myths and legends have live with humanity from before history shaping and guiding our development. One of these beings is Phastos (Brian Tyree Henry) whose particular gift to humanity is teaching us technology.

Phastos’ faith in humanity is shattered with our use of technology and this is exemplified in the movie by having him break down crying amid the rubble of Hiroshima.

Yes, the nuclear bombs kill hundreds of thousands. Yes, they were the very cutting edge of science and technology at the time. But millions were murdered by the Nazis in Europe, millions. Their murders did not end the war, their murders were the point of the war. Murder on such a scale is impossible with the technology of industrialization. The vast incomprehensible scale of it is only achievable with the industrial revolution.

One can argue the terrible ‘trolley problem’ of ending the war in the Pacific with nuclear weapons. Would it have been more moral to forego the atomic attacks and launch a ground invasion that would have almost certainly cost far more lives? That’s a debate that cannot be resolved because it is a personal value judgement, but the slaughter of the innocent in camps built only for death? That is undebatable. That is a clear and perverse corruption of technology and that is what should have shattered Phastos belief in humanity.

Share