Category Archives: Politics

Can Texas Send a Democrat to the Senate This Cycle?

.

Well, the answer to that is yes, it can but will it do so is a very different proposition. It has been about 30 years, three decades, since a Democrat has won a statewide office in the nation’s second-largest state. Texas is about as ‘red’ as you can get in terms of how friendly the political ground is for the Republican party, but that doesn’t mean it is impossible for this year’s election to erupt with a surprise in November.

The most compatible comparison might be the 2018 Senate race between Beto O’Rourke and incumbent Senator Ted Cruz. It was an off-year cycle election with Trump in the White House and a presidential approval of less than 50 percent. While O’Rourke failed to dislodge the disliked senator from his seat, his failure was closer than one might expect in the Lone Star State, falling about two and a half points behind when the votes were tallied. It was not a terribly surprising result as at no point during the election cycle did O’Rourke lead Cruz in the polling.

2026 is not the same as 2018.

Trump’s approval numbers are in the low 30s with some polls dropping him into the 20s. In 2018 the economy was humming along with very low interest rates without any serious inflation concerns. 2026 on the other hand is seeing serious inflation, with gas and food prices rising rapidly in the shadow of an unpopular war without an apparent end in sight. This is the situation at the start of the summer with a long hot travel season ahead. Add to this that while O’Rourke sought to unseat an incumbent, Talarico isn’t facing the same challenge.  While Cruz was personally unlikeable to many, he presented and coded as a bog-standard Republican politician. The same cannot be said of Paxton, whose scandal sheet trails him like toilet paper stuck to his heel. Also, unlike O’Rourke, Talarico has already led his opponent in several polls.

Does this mean that Talarico will win?

No.

I would still call Paxton the favorite but not a prohibitive one. This cycle is trending closer to a toss-up than any Texas Senate race in memory. I think this race will be close enough that the national party will be forced to expend resources on a race that in any other year they could have safely ignored. November, no matter how it turns out, should provide some excitement.

Share

Should Firearm Owners be Held Responsible for the Misuse of Their Weapons?

.

San Diego this week suffered yet another mass murder tragedy when two young men, one apparently still legally a boy and the other legally an adult, murdered three people at a local Islamic center and mosque before taking their own lives. It is a terrible history that this city has at least three times has been thrust into the national spotlight for this sort of violence; Brenda Spencer in 1979 when she opened fire on an elementary school, killing two adults, injuring eight children, and a police officer, James Huberty in July 1984 when he killed 22 and injured another 19 at a McDonald’s, and now this act of brutality.

Early reports, and it should always be kept in mind that early reports are often erroneous and littered with mistakes, indicate that the firearms were taken from the parents of one of the cowardly killers. This week’s attack is not the first in which the perpetrators obtained their weaponry from others who legally possessed the firearms. The unsecured nature of the firearms is in these particular cases a crucial element in the chain that led to murderous disaster.

Gun safety advocates often attempt to pass laws that would require firearms in the home to be secured in a gun safe to prevent theft and misuse while gun rights enthusiasts dispute such proposals usually upon the lines that rapid access to firearms is necessary for self-defense in the home and that the expense of gun safes is in effect a tax with the purpose to depress ownership rather than any actual and practical safety concern.

Should firearm owners who do not secure their firearms in a manner that precludes easy theft or use by an unauthorized person face either criminal or civil accountability?

In criminal law there is the doctrine of felony murder which stipulates that anyone who participates in a felony crime can be held legally responsible for murders that are committed in the commission of that offense even if the person did not actively participate in the killing directly. A getaway driver outside of the bank being robbed is equally guilty of murder as the man who gunned-down the security guard inside the bank.

It is clear that felony murder doesn’t apply to people who have had their firearms taken without their consent or with no knowledge of the crime that is about to be committed with them. Any criminal liability would have to come from new legislation passed with that clear intent. Is such a course wise?

Perhaps.

It is clear from the sheer number of unsecured firearms in homes across the nation that to rely on the inherent responsibility of their owners is a fool’s errand. It is also clear that such proposals would face fierce opposition from the gun rights community. There was a township in the state of Georgia that passed a local ordinance making it a crime to leave a firearm in an unlocked motor vehicle. That’s it, if you left a gun in your car you had to lock the car. The conservative state government in the next session amended their supremacy laws to make such a local ordinance void. It is hard to imagine a more benign restriction of firearms possession but even that proved to be a bridge too far. I doubt any such legislation as required firearms be secured and that the owners would share in some criminal liability for unsecured guns used in crimes could ever see the light of day.

Civil liability has a better shot at viability but that requires private civil actions that incur expensive legal actions and to be honest, civil penalties carry not the weight and fear that criminal ones do.

In the short term there is no solution to this nation’s gun death troubles, of which about half are suicides but being self-inflicted doesn’t make those deaths any less tragic or any less worthy of prevention. The truth of the matter is that this is. deep cultural infection and one that has hounded our nation for generations and will likely carry on for generations more.

Share

Q-Ships and the coming Gerrymander Wars

.

In the early days of the Great War, later to be known as World War I, there existed a distinct set of rules for conducting warfare by submarines against civilian shipping. After all civilian ships are not military combat vessels and it was considered a crime to sink civilians without warning. Undersea Boat, U-Boats, were, when attacking a civilian shop, expected to surface, announce that the ship was targeted to be sunk, and provide the crew and passengers time to abandon the ship in their lifeboats, and once that evolution had been completed, then the sub would sink the vessel. All very proper and civilized warfare.

England, an island nation, quickly discovered that losing tons of shipping weighed heavily on both their economy and their population. They took drastic action to save their crucial shipping, inventing the Q-ship. A Q-ship, converted from a standard commercial vessel, boasted deck guns that could be hidden from view. (And the reason the department of hidden and special gadgets is known as Q-branch.) Once an enemy U-boat surfaced and made its intention to attack known, the hidden guns would be deployed and the submarine sunk. Imperial Germany responded rationally and stopped providing civilian ships with any warning, sinking them on sight in unrestricted submarine warfare, pushing the United States of America to enter the war.

When the sequel war came about no nation attempted restricted submarine warfare, instead sinking enemy vessels of every type without warning or mercy – evidence that any standard or norm once abandoned is forever lost.

The Constitution of the United States requires that every decade the federal government performs a census and based upon that the congressional districts for the House of Representatives are drawn.

In 2003 after the Republicans gained full control of the government of Texas, they sought to replace the district maps that had been drawn following the 2000 census, breaking the norm of only redrawing the districts each decade. Democratic members of the Texas government even fled the state in an attempt to deny a quorum and prevent the redrawing of the lines but ultimately failed to kill the scheme. In 2006 the mid-decade redistricting got the seal of approval from the US Supreme court when they interpreted the constitution as requiring a redistricting every ten years but not forbidding it at other times. Further exacerbating the issues of congressional districts is a pair of Supreme Court decisions, 2019’s call that the issue of drawing lines for partisan purposes lies beyond the scope of Federal courts to address and this year’s call that the Voting Rights Act doesn’t require majority-minority districts throws open the season for unrestricted gerrymandering warfare. Districts drawn to advantage one political party that just happen as a side-effect disadvantage any particular racial group are now perfectly constitutional.

As with submarine warfare a civilized norm once abandoned is dead. With early votes in the primary already cast, Louisiana is seeking to redraw their districts to eliminate Democratic seats and states with Democratic trifectas are speaking of drawing lines that eliminate every Republican seat within their states.

I despise the current and proposed gerrymanders, but I am also a realist and understand that the current Republican party, headed by a vainglorious buffoon who hates above all things being held in the slightest manner accountable will never ever reach a consensus to ban the offensive practice of politicians picking their voters. The only hope that exists is for the GOP to lose their hold on the Federal government and for the Democrats, should they hold all three branches in 2029, be forced, and they will have to be forced because like the ring of power having the seats is powerfully seductive, to fix this with Federal laws.

Share

Virginia Votes Today

.

Today the state of Virginia votes to gerrymander the hell out of its Congressional districts, taking the current map of 11 districts from a 6 for the Democratic party and 5 for the Republican party to a 10 for the Democrats leaving just a single district that favors the GOP.  It is the latest front on the mid-cycle redistricting war that has raged across the nation since the GOP operating under their total fealty to Trump began redrawing districts in Texas, North Carolina, Missouri, and potentially Florida, hoping to staunch the bleeding to come with this fall’s general election. Unwilling to simply lie back and take it, the Democratic party across the United States has redrawn maps where they possessed the power to do so, in California going to the voters with a special election as is the case in Virginia today.

Gerrymandering is a perversion of the basic principles of democracy. Instead of the voters choosing and electing their representatives the representative, sitting on a treasure trove of data, draw their electoral maps, choosing the voters that will most likely elect them to their seats. In the age of networked computers and artificial intelligence growing quickly in capabilities, the drawing of election maps that can accurately and reliably produce desired outcomes transforms from an arcane art into a sinister science.

With the Supreme Court of the United States having declared that gerrymandering for blatantly political purposes as ‘non-justiciable’, that is beyond the scope of any court, the floodgates were not thrown open on the process; the entire dam was demolished.

I have, for decades, been an opponent of the gerrymander. The process deeply offends my sense of what is right and what is wrong, but with that said I am also a realist. The Republicans, have fewer spines that an amoeba, supplicating themselves to a conman, a criminal, and sexual abuser giving away any remaining elements of honor and moved the conflict from a knife to a gunfight requiring the Democrats to drop their knife and match the warfare that is actually being waged.

I want Virginia to pass its constitutional amendment and fight fire with fire and then maybe in 2029 if we are fortunate enough to have a Democratic trifecta nationally pass legislation to end political gerrymandering once and for all.

Share

The Post-War World is Passing Away

.

And not even the wisest can know what world is being born.

It is a testament to the power of the order that emerged following the Second World War that the term ‘post-war’ is instantly understood with no confusion as to which war is being referred even as that war, its evils, its heroism, and its terrible cost, passes out of living memory. Soon there will be none alive for whom that global struggle is a memory, and it will live only in textbooks, documentaries, and retold narratives. More importantly, the structures erected following the war are now beginning to crumble.

A lot of the destruction of that world order, one that had been laid upon a foundation of law, both national and international, and alliances can be laid at the feet of Donald J. Trump and his backwards, idiotic, and vainglorious mentality. A man who meets the clinical criteria for malignant narcissism coupled with the intelligence of a stunted teenager and the morals of a grifting carnival barker should have never risen to occupy the most important post on Earth. He did not achieve that posting by himself, no there is great culpability to be spread around, some obvious and direct, such as the men with far greater intelligences who saw their duty to the nation and set it aside for their own comfort and prosperity some not so direct, such as the reforms of the 60s that sapped the strength of political parties until they grew so weak as to be unable to fend off attacks from within. Now, with this low IQ, self-dealing, vengeful little man helming our nation’s course into the future, those institutions that have guided and safeguarded the world since the end of the war are falling like rusting relics. Trump alone did not kill off the post-war order, cultural movements around the world contributed to that, but a just, smart, and principled American president may have been able to provide the leadership in these dark times that could have saved and strengthened them, but that ship has sailed and it has sunk.

A New World Order will emerge and not I nor anyone else can know what it will be. We can hope and fight for one that is driven by law and justice and a respect for human life in all the many forms that it can take but that is far from an assured outcome. The time of change has been given to us and it is only us that will shape it into reality. It is a terrible and terrifying responsibility.

Share

Republicans Reject Responsibility

.

The Constitution of the United States of America clearly and deliberately gives the power to declare war to Congress and not to the executive. The modern age and a parade of presidents has eroded the distinction between military action and war. Since the Second World War Congress has acquiesced to the White House more and more latitude in conducting offensive military action but still recognizing their role in the process with legislation such as an Authorization for Use of Military Force.

Trump launched his sudden and extensive bombing campaign against Iran without any form of Congressional approval. This is not one fast mission with a clearly defined goal, this is a prolonged campaign with ill-defined, if defined at all, objectives. Destroying that nation’s nuclear ambitions, that had been ‘obliterated’ nine months prior, preventing a retaliatory strike following an attack by one of our allies, collapsing Iran’s government, have all been both expressed and denied as goals of the bombing war. It is clearly the purview of Congress to debate and either approve or forbid this action. Yet legislation to do precisely that has been killed by the Republican leadership of both houses.  Politicians who have repeatedly and loudly accused nearly every executive action by Democratic presidents of being a step towards serfdom and an illegal usurpation of the Constitution cower from the cult that surrounds this president, breaking their oaths of office and proving to anyone with unbiased eyes that they are from a political party unfit for power.

Share

We are the Harkonnens

.

Late Friday evening, early Saturday morning, President Trump, in coordination with the nation of Israel, initiated ongoing military actions which were the equivalent of war, against Iran without bothering to obtain, even consult with, the Congress of the United States of America, the sole body given by our constitution with the authority to declare war.

Do not misconstrue, by deliberate intent and misrepresentation or by casual, clumsy reading, that my opinions here in any manner or way voice support for that theocratic despotic regime of that nation. The Islamic revolution brought no freedom to the Iranian people but moved them from a secular despot to a theocratic one. My concerns at the moment though are for the American people and the rot that is corrupting our national system.

Trump did not ‘sell’ the American people on this war. He did not spend days or weeks laying the evidence and case that this action was essential to our security and safety as a people or as a nation. He did not go to congress, one that is entirely controlled by his own political party and has shown repeatedly that there is no debasement that they will not endure to place his will into action, to gain their consent and authorization for the military misadventure. Trump did not rally our allies, he did not build a coalition to generate international support for this attack. He, along with the Prime Minister of Israel, two charter members of the ‘Board of Peace’ of which Trump is Chairman for life, charged ahead with their plots and plans to decapitate the Iranian leadership sans any congressional authorization or approval — blatantly unconstitutional.

Trump’s supporters will inhabit the spectrum from full-throated support to shamed silence and deceptive ‘what-aboutisms’ to deflect from this authoritarian action. People who are quick to push their pocket constitutions into your face, screaming ‘Unconstitutional!’ at even the mildest firearm regulation will suddenly fall quiet about this abuse of executive power and privilege. If they speak at all it will be to declare criticisms of Trump to be ‘unpatriotic’ and the product of Trump Derangement Syndrome.

How long will this war last? I don’t know, no one knows. Once begun such things have a life of their own. Iran is striking back, after all they were attacked without warning or declaration of war, making the Trump administration more like the Harkonnens of Dune than the founding fathers. It is very hard to win a war purely from the air and I doubt that this administration possesses neither the spine nor the stomach for ground action. We have started a war on a footing that seems highly unlikely to produce a clean definitive resolution.

The Islamic Republic of Iran may fall internally, creating a power vacuum that apparently Trump and his allies hope will be filled by kinder, gentler people. Though if history is any guide the kind and the gentle generally do not outcompete the cruel and vicious in filling power vacuums. Rebellions may be built on hope, national strategies should not be.

The Islamic Republic may withstand these blows, in which case the hope is that the new leaders are cowed and subservient to America and Israel’s wishes. That too strikes me as an unrealistic outcome. Any new leadership must not only manage external forces, such as the implacably hostile American and Israeli positions but internal stresses which range from insurrectionist forces and the desire of current forces, such as The Islamic Revolutionary Guard, unwilling to surrender their own power. Pride and ego will be powerful determining forces in the post-conflict environment and people who have been humiliated are disinclined to be submissive. People die for pride.

I have no hope that the Republicans in charge of the House or the Senate will find the backbone to live up to their oaths and so it will fall onto the American people to replace them this fall with men and women who will.

Share

It Is Here — Now

.

The Science Fiction writer William Gibson is attributed with saying “The future is here now — it’s just not evenly distributed,” referring to the fact that on this planet exist fantastic technologies nearly beyond belief and people who scrape by burning wood as their only fuel source, existing in abject poverty. Well, the same is very true for the United States of America and fascism, the fascism is here it is simply not evenly distributed.

If you are not dark-skinned with an accent, not politically active in a manner disapproved of by the regime, not currently living in a locality flooded with masked armed agents of the state, then you do not feel the presence of the fascism. It is, at best, theoretical to you and at worst invisible. The fascism poisoning our government was not theoretical to Renee Good, it was not invisible to Alex Pretti, it was not something happening elsewhere to the more than 30 persons who have died in ICE custody since this Administration took power. That is compared to the 24 persons who died in similar custody during the previous administration’s entire 4-year term of office.

In addition to these deaths, some of which in my opinion are murders, plain and simple, people have been assaulted for exercising their First Amendment rights, legal residents have been snatched off the street by masked goons with neither uniform nor identification, homes have been violently entered without judicial warrant and some of the highest officials answered these violations of people’s rights with the mocking assertion that Federal Officers engaged in their duties have ‘Absolute Immunity.’

And what of the Gadsden Flag Waving, 2nd Amendment worshiping, radical Constitutionalist who insisted electing Trump was vital to protecting our God-given rights, particularly our 1st Amendment right to free speech?

Well, they’re busy mouthing the regime’s lies, slanders, and character-assassination of the victims, or they have slithered into silence, finding other ‘outrages’ to occupy their keyboard warrior ethos. It turns out they were quite literal with the Gadsden worship, they do not want to be trod upon but ‘go ahead and stomp on those people over there, we never liked ’em.’

Repressive violent suppression of the regime’s enemies spurs no cries of ‘dictatorship!’ in the same manner as expanding healthcare. It exposes a very simple truth.

Not for all of them but for far too many racism trumps the 1st, 2nd, and 4th amendments.

Share

That’s Not A Battleship…

So, Trump, in his boundless narcissism, has decided that the United States Navy needs battleships again, and that these should be known as ‘Trump Class’ battleships serving as the centerpiece of his golden fleet initiative.

Of course, like with nearly every single thing that comes from this man, they are not what he promises and are vaporware, produced to stroke the ego of a vain and insecure toddler.

The proposed ships are not battleships in any conventional sense of the word. Ships are rated by their displacement—that amount of water that is displaced by the vessel as it sits there floating in the ocean. The USS New Jersey fully loaded with crew, supplies and munitions displaced 61,000 tons. A destroyer, small fast and agile ships might displace as much as 9,900 tons, this proposed ‘Trump-Class Battleship,’ if it ever came into existence, is slated to displace about 35,000 tons, about half the size of an actual battleship.

The first ship to be commissioned in this proposal would be the USS Defiant, making the truth of the matter even more clear as the first ship commissioned is the lead ship and the vessel from which the class name is derived. These vaporware vessels would be Defiant Class ships, but hey we know that Trump would just love to slap his name on it before it glides down the slipway into the water. Not that it ever will, or if by happenstance it does, it will be far beyond the current presidential term and in all likelihood this president’s life expectancy.

What these deranged fantasies expose is that Trump, a dim-witted and ignorant man, is fixated on navies that haven’t actually mattered in over a century.

The last major war where battleships dominated the seas was World War I. By the next world war, the battleships lost their throne as monarchs of the seas to the aircraft carrier. Beyond delivering massive shore bombardment, battleships serve little purpose beyond being massive and terribly expensive targets.

I do wonder if we are watching the next major evolution in naval warfare as the Russian invasion of Ukraine plays out. The Black Sea fleet has been humbled and not by new sleek warships but by cheap uncrewed drones. Is perhaps the next dominant warship not something with guns that can throw shells the size of cars 20 or more miles or floating cities filled with the latest and most expensive jet fighters and pilots, but rather small fast agile vessels that can unleash hell in the manner of hundreds if not thousands of cheap hard to detect and hard to hit drones?

Either way, the man-baby that sits in the defiled Oval Office is too stupid and too vain to see it.

Share

Proposition 50 a Necessary Evil

A friend messaged me the other day asking my opinion on California’s ballot initiative Proposition 50, which temporarily suspends the independent commission responsible for drawing the state’s Congressional districts in order to allow a directed gerrymander before next year’s off-cycle elections.

I favored and voted for the measure, though I did deem it something I wished I had the opportunity and freedom to oppose. I despise gerrymandering. It is the process where politicians choose their voters rather than the voters choosing their representative. Under normal circumstances, voting against Prop 50 would have been nearly automatic for me.

These are not normal circumstances.

Even before last week’s elections blew fear into the hearts of Republicans, they sensed the anger in the electorate and, given the history of off-cycle elections, knew that their position of power had become precarious. Rather than adjust their policies in hopes of persuading voters to trust them, Trump demanded that Texas redistrict to carve out five new seats deemed “safe” for the GOP, a bid to keep their grip on government.

It is unwise to go into a duel where your opponent has brought a pistol when you had agreed to swords and not change your choice of weapons. California’s abandonment of its commission was tossing aside the sword to pick up a pistol.

However necessary, it is still gerrymandering—manipulating the maps to dramatically influence the outcome of an election, a concept that is at its heart anti-democratic. I would prefer that the nation find a way to kill the process of gerrymandering in all states, but one cannot fight by “gentlemen’s rules” when the other side insists on being small-handed barbarians.

I would also consider it terribly important that the size of the House be expanded. Here is a graph showing that while US population has swelled, the House has been fixed for over a century, compounding our troubles.

us_congress_population_graph

Share