Category Archives: Politics

Of Presidents and Catering Trucks

.

July 9th of this year, President Trump returning from an overseas trip secretly switched aircraft due to what the Secret Service believed to be a credible threat against the vehicle. Utilizing a catering truck, the President, after visibly boarding Air Force One, left the most famous aircraft in the world and boarded another military airplane for his return to the United States. While the Secretary of Defense and Trump’s personal assistant flew with him to the military aircraft, Secretary of State Rubio and Secretary of the Treasury Bessent, along with the White House Press Pool remained aboard the identified Airforce One, returning to the United States ignorant that they now rode in an aircraft that the Secret Service believed to be a target of a credible threat.

When the day arrives that Donald J. Trump assumes room temperature, you will see no tears shed by me, in fact, it is quite likely that the corners of my lips will curl upwards in a satisfied smile. Paraphrasing The Manchurian Candidate’s fictitious Senator Jordan Trump “Could not do more damage to this nation if he were a paid communist agent.” Despite my feelings of utter horror and contempt for the man currently holding the awesome office of President of the United States, his assassination would , perhaps at this time, be the worst fate that could befall this nation. Myths are born of such events and this nation does not need more myths but more truth, so if the Secret Service feels that the threat is real enough that a game of Three-Card-Monty with official aircraft are required to keep the President safe, then that game needs to played, and played well.

With that said it was not needed to fly the decoy aircraft with innocent and ignorant people aboard who may have lost their lives had the threat materialized. All that was required was that the world at large, and presumably the actors threatening the presidency, continued to believe that Trump was aboard the official Air Force One until he was safely beyond the scope of the danger. While the President flew to the United Kingdom aboard the other military aircraft the press and the world could have been told that he was business conferring in the meeting space aboard his aircraft and would not depart until the conference had concluded.

Rank and rampant speculation about the ‘meeting’ would erupt; what could it be with the Secretary of State and treasury aboard but not Defense? No word, no further official statements would fuel the theorizing and once the President was safe in the UK the ruse could be revealed with a flourish nodding towards the expertise and skill of America’s Secret service, without endangering any innocent lives.

But, of course, this is not what happened.

Trump, a narcissist incapable of thinking of anyone but himself, not only contemptuously, casually, and with utter indifference endangered the lives of senior officers of the U.S. Government and the reporters aboard the decoy aircraft, but once the deception came to light, insisted that it was himself that remained in the great danger. For Trump, at all times and in all situations everything, everywhere is about him and only him. No other person has any value at all except in their servitude to the mad king.

And what of Secretaries Rubio and Bessent?

They are men so thoroughly broken that they continue to bend the knee, kiss the ring, and lick the boots of the man who so dismissively endangered them. History will remember them as cowards that abandoned their former beliefs for the momentary glare of a spotlight whose edges they shared with an egotist that cared for them not at all.

Share

They Deserve Better

.

As I have mentioned from time to time on this space, when I graduated High School I enlisted in the U.S. Navy, a life that I was not particularly well suited for and that I left, at their request, in early 1982. I make no bones about it, the military life was not for me and there are particulars about my services that made the situation worse, but I harbor no ill will towards anyone that serves, quite the opposite. I had friends that remained in the Navy for many years including one who became a ‘lifer’; someone who served for twenty years and retired. I have deep wells of respect for those that serve and understand, a little, some of the hardships and sacrifices that they endure in service to our nation, which fuels the enragement burning inside me at the reports of the living conditions aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln.

During my nearly three years in the United States Navy, I was stationed aboard one ship, the USS Belleau Wood, an amphibious assault ship that carried Marines and a Marine airwing for taking beaches in wartime, and aboard the Burning Wood I spent eight months deployed on a cruise of the Western Pacific, so I know something of life at sea in military service.

Over the course of those eight months, we made no less than 9 port calls, 10 if you include Diego Garcia, a tiny atoll in the center of the Indian Ocean with nothing to do but as one classic SF film put it ‘throw rocks at cans, and we gotta bring our own cans.’ The Belleau Wood made some sort of port call pretty much every month of the deployment and those port calls were more than just a chance for the crew to go ashore for liberty and escape the confines of their metal city; they were places to refuel, resupply, reequip, and do vital maintenance that is difficult or impossible to perform while underway. Ships can be resupplied while cruising at sea. Unrep (Underway Replenishment) is a vital element of a ship’s duty while on station and one that was performed under security conditions because the U.S. Navy had mastered techniques that our adversaries had not and we wanted to keep it that way. That said, there are limitations to what and in what quantities of stores that can be delivered to a ship in this manner. Unrep cannot replace a port call, not for any ship.

The USS Lincoln and her battle group were diverted from their usual patrol in November of 2025 and sent to the Gulf in preparation for this administration’s idiotic war. In that time, much of which the crews served under wartime conditions, the ships had precious few port calls. It is quite difficult to keep such a battle group supplied with just the essentials for their operations, much less the ‘niceties’ of life, such as fresh fruit, things for the crew to buy in the ship’s stores, and so during such a prolonged deployment, but such considerations are beyond the concern of this president and his cabinet of yes-men lackeys. Reports from the Lincoln indicated that morale has crashed with possible suicide attempts among the crew. Mind you, we are getting reports principally from the Carrier herself. I have seen nothing from the smaller ships that comprise her escorts, ships with far less ‘generous’ amenities and with far more cramped living conditions. (Not that a Carrier is a hotel. For everyone aboard this is something that will test your endurance and without a clear and understanding of the mission that endurance begins weakened.)

Trump and his SecDef treat these men and women of the military as game pieces on a board moved about to inflate his ego in a vain and futile attempt to fill the deep void at the heart of his soul. The abuse of our troops, ashore and at sea, is a consequence of the voters, who may not have known better, and the spineless cowards in the government who certainly knew better but placed their own status and riches ahead of the nation’s interest and the troops that they so cavalierly abuse.

Share

Airplane! and Anita Bryant’s Cultural Irrelevancy

.

Last night on YouTube I watched a Canadian millennial couple react to the 1980 absurdist comedy film Airplane! As with the many of the reactors who have engaged with this piece of silly cinema, much of the chaotic comedy still worked 46 years later, and some were too fixed to their time and place to have any meaning to people born more than a decade after the movie’s release. It is a strange quirk of comedy that the ‘Jim never has a second cup of coffee at home’ gag is rewarded with laughs because of the strangeness of the spouse’s thoughts, and without any context to the Yuban coffee commercial it is lampooning.

While references to Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan spark some recognition in younger viewers, and the use of serious dramatic actors in farcical skits has little to no impact on those who are watching this movie from the last century, this is not the issue that is sticking with me today. One target of the filmmaker’s sharp critique stirs no reaction and is nothing but a forgotten cultural relic, Anita Bryant.

Anita Jane Bryant, beauty pageant queen, singer with multiple top-ten hits, and ubiquitous citrus spokeswoman for much of her career, was a popular but not stellar figure in the American cultural landscape, often traveling with the legendary Bob Hope on tours to support and entertain the Armed Forces, and finding herself welcome at both the Democratic and Republican national conventions. She hosted parades, performed at half-time shows for the Super Bowl, and even at the funerals of Democratic presidents, and yet today her name, except for whom politics is a passion or who either in or adjacent to the gay community, is almost entirely forgotten.

In 1977, Dade County, Florida, passed the first ordinance in the nation that prohibited discrimination in housing based upon sexual orientation, protecting gay men and women from prejudicial treatment when it came to renting homes, igniting the ire of Bryant, a fire that would consume her career and, in the end, erase her from cultural memory.

Bryant successfully led a campaign that overturned the ordinance, but that victory raised the issue to the wider culture, and while gay rights were not an unknown thing before Bryant’s crusade, (Stonewall was 8 years earlier,) her actions made the cause much more salient to the national conversation. Sponsors dropped her from their advertising campaigns, networks rescinded offers to host weekly television programs, and her career over the next decade functionally ceased to exist. In order to legally allow bigoted people to refuse homes to those whom she despised, Bryant self-immolated to the point that by the time of her death in 2024 she had ceased to be known by the wider public at all.

Both sides waged the political fight in Dade County with ferocity, Bryant deploying the slanderous, vile label that gay men preyed upon children to ‘recruit’ new homosexuals, while some among the fight for rights resorted to political violence. Yes, that violence was shaving cream pies to her face, but it remained political violence, and in my opinion, one only employs violence when no other path remains open and the physical threat from the dominant political actors is very real. While a direct line cannot be drawn from these pie attacks to the January 6th insurrection, the indirect lineage is there.

Anita Bryant’s obscurity is, in the end, the best of all possible victories over her bigoted political warfare.

Share

A Tongue-In-Cheek Insult Has Become the Default

.

 When political commentator and trained psychiatrist Charles Krauthammer proclaimed for the first time that someone suffered from ‘Bush Derangement Syndrome,’ he was not entirely wrong. Democratic presidential contender Howard Dean had suggested, without coming right out and saying it, that President George W. Bush had, due to his connections with the Saudi royal family, advance knowledge of the terrible 9/11 terrorist attacks that killed nearly 3000 people and hurtled this nation to war in the Middle East. As with any major event in the media (the Moon Landing, the Kennedy assassination, Bruce Lee’s untimely death, and so on), there invariably follow flocks of conspiracy theories seeking to give secret but understandable reasons for the events, and 9/11 was no different. G.W. Bush, who had come to the office while losing the popular vote, through methods and decisions that were, for many, very easy to question, was a ripe target for such thinking, but suggesting such things without evidence for political gain is, at the very least, distasteful. As such, calling Dean ‘deranged’ for this level of antipathy towards Bush is not entirely without some justification; however, it did not stop there, with that one column, that one instance, but became for the conservatives of America the rallying cry and universal shield against all criticisms of the Bush presidency as, over the years, support for the man plummeted. By the end of his second term in office, scarcely a third of the nation supported the man and yet the right continued its assertion that attacks against him and his policies were evidence of Bush Derangement Syndrome.

Of course, the vitriol hurled at his successor, questioning his birth, the endless coded and not-so-coded racial attacks, controversies over such insignificant issues as wearing a tan suit, ‘terrorist’ fist bumps, and the like were never considered a symptom of derangement. The phrase was not retired but merely put away for safekeeping, like an assault rifle in a safe, ready to be wielded when the times changed.

And times they did change.

In 2016, the Republicans nominated and elected a man who embodied every insult that they had hurled at Democratic presidents: the lying, the sexual degeneracy, and the financial corruption they saw in Bill Clinton, Trump exceeded by every measure; the ‘cult of personality,’ the political inexperience, the irreverence for the institutions, the domineering, authoritarian, free-speech-quashing behavior that they accused Obama of, Trump trumpeted at every turn. Even with Trump’s successor, Biden, whom they accused of mental incompetency, Trump, with his limited intelligence and willful ignorance, is the living example of those insults, but to say such things, to point out what is obvious to the most casual observer, is only heralded by the right as proof of ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome.’

Well, if acknowledging reality makes me ‘deranged,’ then I have no need to be cured.

Share

People in 1941 Were So Dumb

.

Anyone who listens to the wise, educated, and informed opinions of right-wing podcasts and revisionist historians, who possess the courage to dismiss all the collective judgment and scholarship of their peers, knows that it is an unquestioned fact that communism and fascism are two very similar branches of the same tree firmly rooted in the politics of the left.

What is surprising is that the people of 1941, who were living with the active and expanding aggressive wars of both the fascists of Italy and Germany, were so ill-informed as to make the same blundering error as the woke-infested historians of our days and see communists and fascists as somehow opposites, as left vs right. This shallow understanding of true political knowledge is perfectly displayed in what many scholars of cinema call the finest motion picture ever produced, Citizen Kane.

The film opens, after the on-screen death of Charles Foster Kane (Orson Welles), with a newsreel covering the man’s public life. (In the days before television, short films of the nation’s and world’s news played in theaters before the cartoons and movies.) To dramatize how the fictional character was seen so differently and in directly opposite natures by so many millions across the nation two clips are used, one from a banker and one from a labor leader. Here is that clip.

youtube placeholder image

The filmmakers, the screenwriters, and the audience were far too ignorant to understand that communists and fascists were the very same thing, even as they watched the events of the Second World War unfold around them; they remained dumb to the reality of those events which only a few very special people today can perceive accurately.

Of course, it is not even remotely possible that these conservative posters and revisionist historians have their own self-motivated reasoning that draws them down this path of equating the two philosophies. They are far too noble, too objective to fall prey to such human frailties. This forgotten relationship between communism and fascism is not the product of conservatives trying in dire desperation to distance themselves from the mass murderous thugs that populate their history. The postings and tweets from real Americans sharing the depictions that make it plain that the images of the hammer and sickle and of the swastika are in fact completely equivalent are not convoluted rationalizations.

Share

Do Not Become Republicans

.

It would seem that, with the horrid and credible allegations surfacing about Platner, fate has bestowed upon Susan Collins, the GOP senator that promised to serve only two terms, a successful election returning her to the US Senate for a sixth term. Swapping out Platner this late in the cycle for another candidate, most likely the aged Janet Mills, is unlikely to produce an electoral victory for the Democrats, imperiling their quest to take control of the Senate from the spineless and corrupt Republicans.

Given the stakes involved, it is heartening that voices raised in support of Platner are, to quote the bard, ‘But few of any sort, and none of name.‘ However, this is a vital and important ethical juncture for the Democratic Party. The desire, the need, the critical importance of wrestling control of the Federal government and bringing vital checks on this rogue and unlawful administration is a goal that I deeply share but it must not become something so all-consuming that the quest for power renders all other considerations immaterial — that is the path that led, in part, to the GOP becoming captured by Trump and his slavish cult of personality.

Rightly or wrongly, for the last 20-30 years the Republican Party has become more and more myopic about the Democratic Party, seeing them not as a party with the same love of country but simply different policy goals but instead as an evil and wicked force that must be eradicated from the public sphere. The coordinated campaign destroying Bill Clinton was not about tax rates or welfare reform and the years and years spent investigating his supposed financial corruption and the endless berating on his lack of truthfulness were merely means to an end and not an application of principle. The defense and devotion to Trump reveals that lie all too plainly. It was the quest for power and total control that paid false fealty to our Republic while undermining it at every turn that ultimately led to acquiescing to a man who attempted to overthrow the government. And many in the GOP, but far from all, believed that they were on the side of the angels, quite literally, that their ‘just’ end excused every lie that escaped their lips until they welcomed racists and Nazis into their tent, until even the execution of citizens in the streets could be excused.

This is the warning to the Democratic Party, that the single-minded desire to do ‘whatever it takes’ to ‘save the nation’ can in the end damn that which you seek to rescue. I believe that the Republican party must be driven into the wilderness, to wander the trackless political desert until it has shed its sins, but to achieve that goal the Democratic Party must not become the very monsters that they combat.  It starts with Platner and doing what the Republicans are unable to do: throw a credibly accused rapist from the party.

Share

Dementia Donny

.

To be honest I do not know if the president is suffering from any form of age-related dementia; that man has always possessed a quite limited intellect and what people are interpreting as signs of dementia may simply be the effect of surrounding the man with nothing but lickspittles, yes men, and sycophants.

That said, I believe that it is obvious that either due to age or the shielding of his very fragile ego, Donny is not well and not capable, nor has he ever been, of properly exercising the terrible office of President of the United States. He has always been a vainglorious buffoon incapable of admitting error or fault and resistant to correction or even able to tolerate the slightest contradiction. He combines the very worst traits for a person in any leadership position, ignorance, unwillingness to acknowledge his ignorance, an unmitigated temper, and utterly lacking the capacity to see anything at anytime in terms other than how it affects him or beyond his own selfish wants and gluttony.

If we possessed a functioning political system Donny would be removed by his own party. While I have no love at all for the Vance, a political weathervane changing his positions apparently on the same schedule with which he changes his appearance, his characters flaws are far less dangerous to the nation and our systems than Donny’s. Invoking the 25th amendment and replacing the narcissistic and decompensating Donny with Vance would be an act of patriotism not treason but this version of the Republican party, having cultivated hate and anger as their base, cannot enflame that anger against itself, trapping the rest of us with their shortsighted choices of the 1990s.

Of course, blame for our current situation here in 2026 does not fall solely on Donny, his bootlickers, and the spineless GOP, it is also a burden carried by the arrogance of Biden and his team that refused to see the facts as they laid so plainly before them.

It was clear in 2022 that the electorate, and not just the Democratic Party, had no appetite for an aged president and that the economic strain and tribulations of the global pandemic had wreaked enough turmoil that re-election for Biden would be at best challenging. However, his close advisers did not bring this news to then-President Biden, spinning fairy tales to themselves and to their boss that re-election was indeed achievable. Perhaps another man might have seen past the bluster and happy-talk to the unrest and unhappiness in the electorate, but while anyone who advances to the office of President of the United States possesses a larger-than-normal amount of self-importance Biden’s ego has always been his greatest character flaw; these unrealistic projections played directly into it. I recall a moment in Biden’s flamed-out run for the office in the distant time of 1988 when he was confronted by a voter at some event and angrily challenged the man to compare IQs with him. It is a moment that stayed with me over the years and in almost every other election I would vote for someone other than Biden only the unique, and not obviously true, dangers of another Trump term, compelled me to mark him as my selection in 2020.  Had he stuck to his implied promise in that election and not run for a second term our current multiple crises could have been avoided.

That said the ultimate blame and responsibility still lies with Donny himself. He is one that laid illegal tariffs, choking our supply chain and enhancing what had been shrinking inflation, it was he that unleashed violent masked officers of the state to terrorize and kill, it was he that looted the treasury and invited bribes from domestic and foreign sources, it was he that demolished and degraded our national malls and monuments, and it was he that hurled the US into an unprovoked and ill-conceived war that has no end in sight.

Remember, if you find all of this unacceptable, the graft, the corruption, the illegal actions, the economic damage, and the foreign wars, according to the GOP it is you who is deranged and not the people who witness this and proclaim that it is all ‘fine.’

Share

Can Texas Send a Democrat to the Senate This Cycle?

.

Well, the answer to that is yes, it can but will it do so is a very different proposition. It has been about 30 years, three decades, since a Democrat has won a statewide office in the nation’s second-largest state. Texas is about as ‘red’ as you can get in terms of how friendly the political ground is for the Republican party, but that doesn’t mean it is impossible for this year’s election to erupt with a surprise in November.

The most compatible comparison might be the 2018 Senate race between Beto O’Rourke and incumbent Senator Ted Cruz. It was an off-year cycle election with Trump in the White House and a presidential approval of less than 50 percent. While O’Rourke failed to dislodge the disliked senator from his seat, his failure was closer than one might expect in the Lone Star State, falling about two and a half points behind when the votes were tallied. It was not a terribly surprising result as at no point during the election cycle did O’Rourke lead Cruz in the polling.

2026 is not the same as 2018.

Trump’s approval numbers are in the low 30s with some polls dropping him into the 20s. In 2018 the economy was humming along with very low interest rates without any serious inflation concerns. 2026 on the other hand is seeing serious inflation, with gas and food prices rising rapidly in the shadow of an unpopular war without an apparent end in sight. This is the situation at the start of the summer with a long hot travel season ahead. Add to this that while O’Rourke sought to unseat an incumbent, Talarico isn’t facing the same challenge.  While Cruz was personally unlikeable to many, he presented and coded as a bog-standard Republican politician. The same cannot be said of Paxton, whose scandal sheet trails him like toilet paper stuck to his heel. Also, unlike O’Rourke, Talarico has already led his opponent in several polls.

Does this mean that Talarico will win?

No.

I would still call Paxton the favorite but not a prohibitive one. This cycle is trending closer to a toss-up than any Texas Senate race in memory. I think this race will be close enough that the national party will be forced to expend resources on a race that in any other year they could have safely ignored. November, no matter how it turns out, should provide some excitement.

Share

Should Firearm Owners be Held Responsible for the Misuse of Their Weapons?

.

San Diego this week suffered yet another mass murder tragedy when two young men, one apparently still legally a boy and the other legally an adult, murdered three people at a local Islamic center and mosque before taking their own lives. It is a terrible history that this city has at least three times has been thrust into the national spotlight for this sort of violence; Brenda Spencer in 1979 when she opened fire on an elementary school, killing two adults, injuring eight children, and a police officer, James Huberty in July 1984 when he killed 22 and injured another 19 at a McDonald’s, and now this act of brutality.

Early reports, and it should always be kept in mind that early reports are often erroneous and littered with mistakes, indicate that the firearms were taken from the parents of one of the cowardly killers. This week’s attack is not the first in which the perpetrators obtained their weaponry from others who legally possessed the firearms. The unsecured nature of the firearms is in these particular cases a crucial element in the chain that led to murderous disaster.

Gun safety advocates often attempt to pass laws that would require firearms in the home to be secured in a gun safe to prevent theft and misuse while gun rights enthusiasts dispute such proposals usually upon the lines that rapid access to firearms is necessary for self-defense in the home and that the expense of gun safes is in effect a tax with the purpose to depress ownership rather than any actual and practical safety concern.

Should firearm owners who do not secure their firearms in a manner that precludes easy theft or use by an unauthorized person face either criminal or civil accountability?

In criminal law there is the doctrine of felony murder which stipulates that anyone who participates in a felony crime can be held legally responsible for murders that are committed in the commission of that offense even if the person did not actively participate in the killing directly. A getaway driver outside of the bank being robbed is equally guilty of murder as the man who gunned-down the security guard inside the bank.

It is clear that felony murder doesn’t apply to people who have had their firearms taken without their consent or with no knowledge of the crime that is about to be committed with them. Any criminal liability would have to come from new legislation passed with that clear intent. Is such a course wise?

Perhaps.

It is clear from the sheer number of unsecured firearms in homes across the nation that to rely on the inherent responsibility of their owners is a fool’s errand. It is also clear that such proposals would face fierce opposition from the gun rights community. There was a township in the state of Georgia that passed a local ordinance making it a crime to leave a firearm in an unlocked motor vehicle. That’s it, if you left a gun in your car you had to lock the car. The conservative state government in the next session amended their supremacy laws to make such a local ordinance void. It is hard to imagine a more benign restriction of firearms possession but even that proved to be a bridge too far. I doubt any such legislation as required firearms be secured and that the owners would share in some criminal liability for unsecured guns used in crimes could ever see the light of day.

Civil liability has a better shot at viability but that requires private civil actions that incur expensive legal actions and to be honest, civil penalties carry not the weight and fear that criminal ones do.

In the short term there is no solution to this nation’s gun death troubles, of which about half are suicides but being self-inflicted doesn’t make those deaths any less tragic or any less worthy of prevention. The truth of the matter is that this is. deep cultural infection and one that has hounded our nation for generations and will likely carry on for generations more.

Share

Q-Ships and the coming Gerrymander Wars

.

In the early days of the Great War, later to be known as World War I, there existed a distinct set of rules for conducting warfare by submarines against civilian shipping. After all civilian ships are not military combat vessels and it was considered a crime to sink civilians without warning. Undersea Boat, U-Boats, were, when attacking a civilian shop, expected to surface, announce that the ship was targeted to be sunk, and provide the crew and passengers time to abandon the ship in their lifeboats, and once that evolution had been completed, then the sub would sink the vessel. All very proper and civilized warfare.

England, an island nation, quickly discovered that losing tons of shipping weighed heavily on both their economy and their population. They took drastic action to save their crucial shipping, inventing the Q-ship. A Q-ship, converted from a standard commercial vessel, boasted deck guns that could be hidden from view. (And the reason the department of hidden and special gadgets is known as Q-branch.) Once an enemy U-boat surfaced and made its intention to attack known, the hidden guns would be deployed and the submarine sunk. Imperial Germany responded rationally and stopped providing civilian ships with any warning, sinking them on sight in unrestricted submarine warfare, pushing the United States of America to enter the war.

When the sequel war came about no nation attempted restricted submarine warfare, instead sinking enemy vessels of every type without warning or mercy – evidence that any standard or norm once abandoned is forever lost.

The Constitution of the United States requires that every decade the federal government performs a census and based upon that the congressional districts for the House of Representatives are drawn.

In 2003 after the Republicans gained full control of the government of Texas, they sought to replace the district maps that had been drawn following the 2000 census, breaking the norm of only redrawing the districts each decade. Democratic members of the Texas government even fled the state in an attempt to deny a quorum and prevent the redrawing of the lines but ultimately failed to kill the scheme. In 2006 the mid-decade redistricting got the seal of approval from the US Supreme court when they interpreted the constitution as requiring a redistricting every ten years but not forbidding it at other times. Further exacerbating the issues of congressional districts is a pair of Supreme Court decisions, 2019’s call that the issue of drawing lines for partisan purposes lies beyond the scope of Federal courts to address and this year’s call that the Voting Rights Act doesn’t require majority-minority districts throws open the season for unrestricted gerrymandering warfare. Districts drawn to advantage one political party that just happen as a side-effect disadvantage any particular racial group are now perfectly constitutional.

As with submarine warfare a civilized norm once abandoned is dead. With early votes in the primary already cast, Louisiana is seeking to redraw their districts to eliminate Democratic seats and states with Democratic trifectas are speaking of drawing lines that eliminate every Republican seat within their states.

I despise the current and proposed gerrymanders, but I am also a realist and understand that the current Republican party, headed by a vainglorious buffoon who hates above all things being held in the slightest manner accountable will never ever reach a consensus to ban the offensive practice of politicians picking their voters. The only hope that exists is for the GOP to lose their hold on the Federal government and for the Democrats, should they hold all three branches in 2029, be forced, and they will have to be forced because like the ring of power having the seats is powerfully seductive, to fix this with Federal laws.

Share