Film Review: The Fall Guy

.

Notionally a big screen adaptation of the television series that ran between 1981 and 1986 The Fall Guy omits the show’s central conceit of a professional stuntman that has a side gig as a bounty hunter.

Universal Pictures

The 2024 film centers on Stuntman Colt Seavers (Ryan Gosling) induced to return to his profession following an on-set accident in order to save the troubled production by his former flame Jody Moreno (Emily Blunt) as her leading man, Tom Ryder (Aaron Taylor-John) has mysteriously vanished. Colt has a very limited time to discover what dark secrets has caused Tom’s disappearance and somehow repair his shattered romance with Jody before the studio shuts down her production, wrecking her career.

The Fall Guy is a fun film meant for lite entertainment that doesn’t present the audience with heavy philosophical or emotional issues. Gosling and Blunt have good on-screen chemistry, Taylor-Johnson continues to be an screen chameleon vanishing into the part of an arrogant and egotistical star. Direct David Leitch best known for action films such as John Wick and Atomic Blonde turns int a fine film that is a very pleasant two hours of stunts, fights, and likeable characters well worth cheering. This movie is not one that will stick with you and leaving a deep and lasting impression, but it is perfect for a summer afternoon’s escapist entertainment.

Share

Artistic Responsibility

.

Friday night I went out to the movies and watched the big screen adaptation of The Fall Guyand had a pretty good time with a summer popcorn movie.

Before the film there were of course 20 minutes of trailers, and one trailer really pissed me off.

Fly me to the Moon a romantic comedy set in the days before the moon landing between a PR hack (Scarlet Johannsson) and a flight Director (Channing Tatum) as the PR hack tries to boost public interest in the upcoming lunar landing.

I can ignore/forgive the historical inaccuracy about public interest. Leading up to the landing this nation went space happy and after the landings interest waned from the fickle public. However, in the trailer it is also shown that fear of a failed landing prompts the PR Hack to produce a faked landing on a sound stage. This is where my blood boiled.

I think it is grossly irresponsible of the production, which began in 2022, to depict the conspiracy theory that the moon landings were faked. Yes, I understand that this is a comedy, and should be viewed in that light but the world we live in is one riven with conspiracy theories. One should not inject into a culture already diseased with conspiracies about election and life-saving vaccines anything that supports, even as a jest, conspiratorial thinking. People are dying from the conspiracy that the COVID vaccines are dangerous this is not the time to buttress such thinking.

John Carpenter when he wrote and directed, They Live meant it as a satire of Reaganism and what he viewed as the culture of greed in encouraged. However, his simplistic world-building of a secret alien conspiracy controlling and directing the planet’s governments and culture were readily accepted and embraced by neo-Nazis who view the entire film as an allegory that buttressed their diseased antisemitism.

Director Greg Berlanti and screenwriter Rose Gilroy have failed to learn from this terrible lesson and stand to do damage to our nation and our world for the sake of a few cheap jokes.

Share

Roger and It Conquered The World

.

May 9th, at the age of 98, Roger Corman, a man who arguably had the greatest impact on cinema, passed from this bitter mortal realm.

Corman specialized in low budget features, often of a lurid and exploitive nature. His career spanned from the 1950s into the 21st century. He wrote, produced, and directed independently financed feature and along the way ignited the careers of cinema titans like James Cameron, and Jack Nicholson. Bucking the conventions of the period Corman also gave women position of creative control though he was not also above using nudity and ex to sell a picture. (The sexual assault by a giant worm in Galaxy of Terror was at his insistence, over the protests of the director and writer.) Modern cinema and in particular genre cinema simply would not exist in the state it does without Roger Corman.

Sunday evening to honor this man’s achievement I rewatched It Conquered the World.

The film has a ludicrous monster. A creature from Venus that resembles a massive fat carrot and can create organic mind control stinger. Aided by a bittered scientist (Lee Van Cliff) whom the creature has deluded into thinking that this is humanity’s salvation and not its subjugation, the monstrosity seizes control of a small town and the local army base. (Hardly the world.) Pulled back from the grips of his delusion by the death of his wife at the creature claws and the persuasion of a fellow scientist (Peter Graves) he redeems himself in destroying the threat that be led to our planet.

It Conquered the World is fairly typical of a Corman production of the mid to late 50s. There are limited locations and spare sets displaying the absolutely minimal budget but there is also something more to be said than ‘evil monster.’ The film ends with a monologue about the need for humanity to strive and find its own way to paradise and peace. A speech that could have just as easily been part of Star Trek a decade later.

Corman cared about the world. I have read that he apricated the 100 million dollars plus that James Cameron spent making Titanic but was also repulsed by such a sum being used for entertainment when so much misery remained in the world. Keeping his budgets limited certainly made it easier to make money but there was also a moral component that he never lost.

98 is a good run for any human being and we shall never see his likes again.

Share

American Folk Horror

.

There are 3 films that are considered the ‘unholy trinity’ of folk horror movies, The Wicker Man, Blood on Satan’s Claw, & The Witchfinder General. All three come from that cynical decade the 1970s and all three are British in origin. Now, folk horror with its rural settings, ancient practices, and disquieting people can be found around the globe. Estonia’s November from 2017 remains one of my favorites, but what of American, and by that I do mean specifically United States, folk horror.

There are those who would count Eggers’ The Witch as folk horror but that feels like a misclassification to me. That movie is as writer/director Eggers described it a Puritan nightmare. Others classify the original Texas Chainsaw Massacre as folk horror but while its isolated rural setting fits, one deranged family of cannibals do not a culture make and for me folk horror is always about cultures and the clash of outsider to an isolated culture.

1992’s Candyman get closer with its inner-city culture that is decidedly alien to the pretty, blonde, protagonist but it strikes me as more of a ghost story than a folk horror. Vengeful ghosts are great stories but in my eyes they are not ‘folk.’

Isolated communities living by practices forgotten by the wider world in America would seem to point to with Appalachian Mountain towns in the deep recesses of the that rugged terrain or somewhere in the vast American West where so many communities became ghost towns as their fortunes evaporated.

And yet as my mind twists and turns at the germination of an idea for a novel of American Folk horror it is neither the hillbillies nor the cowboys that is drawing my attention and inspiration but rather the hippies of the 1960s.

Counter-culture is simply another culture one that, to an extent, fetishized the idea of abandoning modernity and returning to nature. An isolated commune, 60 years separated from the rushing madness of modern American life feels like a perfect fit for folk horror. What starts are a collective rejecting modernization and mechanization can grow and transform into a unique and alien culture with its own ideas of what is proper to worship.

This is the direct I think I want to go but I need to make up my mind is the horror metaphysical or is it entirely a matter of practice and belief?

Share

The Man or the Bear?

.

For the last couple of week social media has been roiled by the hypothetical question posed to women, if you were alone in the woods would you rather encounter a bear or a man?

When I heard this proposed I had an instant intuitive sense that most women would choose the bear. My impression of the social media fracas seems to support my guess and apparently there have been more than a few men flummoxed by the answer.

Photo Credit: Robert Mitchell Evans

There is no doubt that a bear is a dangerous omnivorous predator with many species presenting as quite territorial. Mauled by a bear is a very painful way to depart this sad world and I do not think for a moment that the women electing ‘bear’ are ignorant of the facts of these animals.

I know of no statistically valid way to produce an off the cuff probability of threat between a random bear and a random man, but I suspect that even if the odds were more dangerous with the bear that would remain the most likely election.

I think most men have little conception of what life is like for most women. The truth be told most people have little conception of what life is like for anyone other than themselves. The ability to project an empathic understanding of another person’s viewpoint and emotional state is a quite rare gift. But what makes the choice so often bear? Why are so many women, fully aware of the dangerous of a large predator, still willing to say ‘bear’ over men?

I think it is the subtle difference between terror and horror.

Bears can be terrifying, but people can be horrifying. A bear presenting a serious risk of injury or harm is much like a tornado. Terrifying to consider but also simply a force of nature. A bear, or a tiger, or a flood simply is without any moral qualification.

People, and men in this hypothetical, are not simply forces of nature and certain their action are bound by moral qualifications.

If a bear mauls you, it does so without volition it is simply following millions of years of evolutionary programming. A man who assaults you does so because he has made a choice. A man is someone capable of understanding the consequences of his actions and has made the calculus that his victims pain, suffering, and trauma are of no consideration. Or worse to be valued and enjoyed. The man knows what harm he causes and elects to cause it. That is true horror in a manner that is not produced by a bear or a flood or a tornado. All of which can cause grievous bodily harm or death but only the man wants to cause it.

Share

Movie Review Brainstorm: (1965)

.

Warner Brothers

Jim Grayam (Jeffrey Hunter, a year prior to his turn in Star Trek’s 1st failed pilot) discovers Lorrie Benson (Anne Francis) passed out in her car stopped dangerously on a railroad crossing. Jim moves the car second ahead of a speeding train and returns Lorrie to her home and her possessive and domineering husband millionaire Cort Benson (Dana Andrews). Eschewing any monetary reward Jim is pulled back into Lorrie’s orbit when she insists on his attendance at a party while her husband is away. Jim and Lorrie begin a torrid affair. (Tastefully off screen as the production while weakened still ruled in 1965.) Benson learning of the affair, deploys his wealth and contacts to destroy Jim’s life and the couple begin to plot their escape with the murder of her husband.

Directed by William Conrad who is best known as an actor, Brainstorm is a tight and fairly entertaining late film noir. There is enough flair in the presentation that make one regret that Conrad’s turned more to performance and less towards direction. Somewhat hampered by the jazz score, as many lesser budgeted films of this period were, the movie still is bolstered by fine performances and reveals that organically develop from the noir plotting.

Anne Francis is quite convincing as Lorrie the trapped spouse of an emotionally abusive man. Her character is not the conniving plotted femme fetal of film noir but rather a sympathetic and terrified woman desperate for escape, but ultimately too broken to stand on her own.

Jeffrey Hunter threw himself into the part of Jim Grayam. Skilled at portraying deeply internal characters here Hunter not only employs those talents but in the film’s third act get to let loose and devour the scenery with deliberately overly expansive performance.

Dana Andrews turns in a perfectly acceptable performance, but his character is one there to drive the plot and as such is the least developed of the core three.

Sam Leavitt’s cinematography is not particularly atmospheric nor is it overly pedestrian but rather balances neatly between the two.

Brainstorm is part of the Criterion Channel’s Hollywood Crack-up collection, a compilation of films dealing with madness and mental manipulation. Before this set appeared on the channel I had never heard of Brainstorm (1965) but I do not regret the one and three-quarters hours I spent Sunday evening watching this piece of cinema.

Brainstorm is currently streaming on The Criterioon Channel.

Share

Villainy in The Wicker Man (1973)

.

(Spoilers for a 57-year-old film)

Another May 1st has come and gone the fictional anniversary of the loss of Sargent Neil Howie West Highland Police to the neo-pagan cult on Summerisle.

The Wicker Man is considered one third of the ‘unholy trinity’ of British Folk Horror films along with Blood on Satan’s Claw and The Witchfinder General. Of the three films The Wicker Manis by far my favorite and the one that intrigues me the most.

Canal Studios

After being lured to the produced producing island of Summerisle by a bogus missing child case, Sgt Howie (Edward Woodward) is burned alive as a human sacrifice by the island’s neo-pagan population lead by the community and religious leader Lord Summerisle (Christopher Lee.)

The question of villainy in this story is an interesting one. Clearly deceiving Howie, subjecting him to secrets tests to determine his suitability as a sacrifice, and then burning him alive to appease the goddess of the fields are not the actions of a good and heroic people.

Howie however while less overly threatening or dangerous displays a willingness and a conviction that the people of Summerisle must be brought to a Christian heel, to be compelled to live in a manner consistent with his interpretation of his religion. His disdain and intent to bring ‘the authorities’ to Summerisle precede any knowledge of actual wrongdoing or violence. Had there been no missing child and Howie had stumbled upon Summerisle he still would have scampered off to bring official action against the people.

It is in these two diametrically that I see the real villain of The Wicker Man; dogmatic conviction.

Blind obedience led the neo-pagans to horribly slaughter a stranger for the island’s religious practices and that very same straitjacket of belief would have led Howie to force his interpretation of morality upon the island.

The small ‘l’ libertarian in me finds all parties in the film to be utterly horrifying, with the neo-pagans only marginally more dangerous.

Share

Movie Review: Argylle

.

From Director Matthew Vaughn and screenwriter Jason Fuchs comes the action/comedy spy flick Argylle.

Apple Films

Ellie Conway (Brice Dallas Howard) author of a series of very successful spy novel featured super spy Agent Argylle (Henry Cavill) finds herself perused by assassins because her novels have been recounting actual events and missions and now a shadowy agency believes that she has the key to locating the story McGuffin. A lone agent Aiden Wilde (Sam Rockwell) attempts to protector her and find the McGuffin in time to win the day.

Argylle starts off in the fictional world of Elle’s novel with vastly exaggerated action and daring feats in theory setting up a dual setting for the film, the over-the-top world of Elle’s imagination and a more grounded reality if her life. This is not what happens the ‘real’ world that Elle’s inhabits is just as exaggerated and requires the same impossible suspension of disbelief as the adventures of Agent Argylle requires.  At one point as we watched the movie at home I turned to my sweetie-wife and said that I missed the grounded realism of Marvel’s Black Widow. (Which we watched the next night as a palate cleanser.)

Despite having a number of cast member that I truly love watching, Bryan Cranston, Sam Rockwell, Samuel L Jackson, and the incomparable Catherine O’Hara, Argylle with is inconsistent tone, contradictory plot and story lines, proved to be a slog to watch. The production design made no distinction between Elle’s imagined events and the supposedly real ones giving the entire movie a sameness that served no purpose. A number of the settings were crafted from CGI and not actual location but with a level of artificiality that created a ‘uncanny valley’ when looking at valleys and not just people.

I can find nothing to recommend in Argylle and it pleases me that my sweetie-wife made the call that we waited until streaming to watch this piece of dreck.

Argylle, should you wish to torture yourself, is streaming on Apple TV+.

Share

On Fictional Cursing

.

Recently on the social media sites where writers congregate there has been a small discussion on the subject of invented curses. Should a writer just use the curses that everyone uses and is familiar with or invent new one for their fantasy and far-future settings.

Invented cursing like artificial slang is a very touchy thing to pull off. Those of us geeks old enough to remember the original run of Battlestar Galactica recall the programs invented curse words like ‘frak’ and ‘feldercarb.’ (I am not cure of the spelling of that last one.) Which were one-for-one replacements for ‘fuck’ and ‘bullshit.’

This ‘just replace it with an invented word’ style of fictional cursing misses the point and understanding of cursing. Cursing is transgressive.

Cursing is about violating the ‘good taste’ and decorum of your culture. It is shocking and emotionally powerful because it is breaking norms and rules. If all you do is change ‘fuck’ to ‘frak’ then in effect you are saying that this alien culture thousands, maybe tens of thousands, of years in our history is just the same as ours today. Possessing the same values the same taboos and therefore the same sense of what is proper and polite.

That’s just lazy.

Plus, it misses the chances the golden opportunity for the writer to show us something about the new culture without stopping for exposition.

A culture with a lot of religion on its history or its current make up will have curse derived from that sense of religion.  No culture that doesn’t have some belief in torturous punishment through damnation is going to have the curse ‘damn you.’ If a culture places no important on familial bloodlines and lineages, then they are not going to use ‘bastard’ as an insult.

Star Trek’s Vulcan are a fiction race that prides itself on total control of their emotional reaction to the point that they insist that they have no emotions. Displaying and suggesting a Vulcan has displayed emotion would be an insult and transgressive. While they are not given to angry outbursts, I could see a Vulcan character calmly looking upon an enemy and saying,’ I have no doubt that gives you,” then with a pause for emphasis ‘joy.’ A stinging insult and rebuke delivered with a flat affectation.

So, think about the cultures your create and then ponder deep on what they consider transgressive and there you will find you curses and insults.

Share

Where the Alien Franchise Went Astray

.

As I write this people across the internets are celebrating the 45th anniversary of the release of Alien, a science-fiction horror film that spawned sequel after sequel and nearly countless knockoffs and imitations.

20th century films

In my appraisal there are only two Alien films of quality, Alien and Aliens. James Cameron wisely decided when he wrote and directed the sequel to the original film that his was not to be horror but action/adventure with only tone of horror. With the conclusion of Aliens Ripley’s story came to an organic and satisfying end. Healed from her traumatic encounter with the Zeta Reticulian parasite and with a new composite family there should have been no more to tell for this woman.

Naturally the studios screwed that up and insulted the audience along the way.

With the next film, Alien3, a production that had a hard release date before it has even a story treatment much less a script, after abandoning such vaunted SF concepts such as wooden space stations crew by technophobic monks, the producers opened the story by killing Ripley’s new family.

The producers considered the audience suckers for investing any emotional energy or commitment to these characters. The lesson is quite clear. Nothing you care about matters. No victory is lasting, all happiness is fleeting, we bring you only despair. Is it really surprising that this production is the one that introduced sexual assault to the franchise?

The proper course after Aliens would have been to craft new stories about new characters. The bold and correct choice would have been to even abandon the parasite as the central threat. Horror repeated becomes adventure and further repeated become dull. This is of course not what the studio did, instead, reviving poor Ripley from her demise and adding scores of parasites in a futile attempt to create a sense of danger and dread where only lame action now existed.

Two ‘prequel’ movies have been produced, a pair of Alien vs Predator movies have squeezed a little more cash from the concept and this year, yet another movie will be released but everything after Aliens has been crap.

Share