Category Archives: Movies

Terrific Art, Terrible Person

As a consumer what do you do when the artist is a terrible person?

In this day and age when less and less of what was once considered ‘private’ become public and common knowledge more and more anyone who is idealized and lionized is revealed to have not just feet of clay but dark black hearts as well.

I am not speaking of just the abrasive personality, the demanding and tyrannical nature of their relations with coworkers and assistants but deeds that are criminal and often unforgivable. I need not give a detailed listing of the recent and distant scandals that reveals some artists, performers, and creators to be truly reprehensible people.

What should you do?

There are no easy or one-size fits all answers. To each of us lies our individual moral duty and obligations and as shepherds of our own consciences we have to find the answers alone, but I can share some of what guides me and perhaps that might illuminate for myself and other how to approach the difficult and fraught choices.

I have to ask myself does the art endorse, reflect, promote, or otherwise give support to the actions that I found reprehensible?

Kevin Spacey is a talented actor and apparently, yet to be proven in a court of law, a terrible person when it comes his behavior. Does his art endorse the sort of actions he has been credibly accused of? It doesn’t seem so to me.

It is easier separate the artist and the art when the art lies completely apart from the artist’s reprehensible actions, Polanski’s Macbeth is my favorite film adaptation of the classic play and has nothing to do with the man’s criminal actions. I can enjoy the filmmaking, the artistry, and still support the position that he deserves the jail time he escaped.

Share

Movie Review: Maleficent

With the trailers for Maleficent: Mistress of Evilplaying in theaters and online prompting some interest from me I decided it was time to see the 2014 feature starring Angelina Jolie.

According to the Wikipedia entry the script for Maleficentwent through 15 drafts and in my opinion it needed 15 more.

The movie is a retelling of Sleeping Beautybut centering the story on the original’s villain, Maleficent. Beginning with a ponderous voiceover narration that suffers from all the worst aspects of prologs the film laboriously goes through the motion of establishing its central characters motivation but devoid of any real characterization. A good half of the movie is spent just establishing elements that have no emotional weight. This is made worse by sub-standard CGI that extends the ‘uncanny valley’ from characters to actual valleys, as the virtual sets never allow a full suspension of disbelief.

Perhaps most damning is that Maleficent herself is a terribly passive character. Yes they give her villainy a reason but she has no goals in the film, there is nothing that she is desperate to achieve and no consequence of failure. By the time the film rolled into its third act I found it impossible to care about the curse, the fairies, or anything at all taking place on the screen. And rather than give us an evil character with understandable motivations and goal Maleficentends with redemption making the transition to the sequel problematic. As with Alien 3you can only get to the sequel by insisting that anyone who did invested emotionally with the previous story were suckers. A sequel should never put the audience in the position of having to discard what they cared for in the previous installments.

Share

Revisiting: Train to Busan

Last night I completed a two-night re-watch of the South Korean zombie film Train to Busan.I originally reviewed this movie January 2017 when I had the good fortune to see it in a local micro-theater. At that time I gushed over the film and for Christmas my sweetie-wife gifted me with the Blu-ray edition. So, how does it hold up two years later? Have scales fallen from my eyes and have flaws now made themselves suddenly prominent in the bit of cinema?

No.

Off the top of my head and without digging deep into the history of zombie movies I’d place this film within the top three zombie movies of all time. Mind you I am speaking of quality and not importance. Train to Busan ranks along side the 1978 Dawn of the Dead  and 2004’s Shaun of the Dead as zombie movies that transcend genre and move into the realm of art. Where Dawn  using it’s time to slyly comment on consumerist culture and Shaun  uses it’s rom-com format to address life when it is unexamined, Train with its passengers slicing through the various strata of Korean society, comments on the nature of individuals and their relationship to each other, most exemplified by the estrangement between the lead and his daughter, but the theme echoes in interactions throughout the cast with no character, not even the self-serving and villainous business man, lacking in human depth and need for connection with those they love and cherish.

Re-watching the film I am thunder-struck by the performances. Not simply the leads, who are all fantastic, but every small part if played with the life and vitality of a serious performance. Simple expression and single lines of delivery suggest complex interior lives for characters that are never even granted to the honor of being named. Not to be overlooked are the amazing mime performances of the actors portraying the zombies. Twisting and contorting their bodies the actor exude a sense of inhumanness that turns what had become a tired and standard screen monster into something that again can truly terrify.

By the heart wrenching ending of the film I was thoroughly engrossed in the characters fully invested emotionally, Train to Busan  is a fantastic film.

Share

Movie Review: Crawl

There are horror film, monster movies, and creature features with significant overlap between these three sub-genres and this week’s releaseCrawl pretty much falls into the Creature Feature definition.

Set in a fictional Florida town of Coral Lake during a category 5 hurricane, Crawl  is about Haley Keller (Kaya Scodelario) and her father Dave (Barry Pepper) trapped in the crawlspace of their home while being menaced by aggressive alligators. If you have seen the trailers for the film then you have pretty much seen the entire premise and set-up. Clocking in at a slim 86 minutes Crawl  doesn’t waste much time, very quickly delivering it’s central character Haley into the jaws of danger and then escalated the obstacles throughout the movie. Focused on the dangers of drowning and deadly alligators the movie is light on character development, though it has some just enough to hang the barest story upon, and any deeper theme beyond survival is wholly absent from the script. With the exception of a few secondary and utterly disposable characters this movies rest entirely upon Haley and Dave as they struggle to survive.

In a high-concept movie there is usually one ‘gimmie’ that is asked of the audience, one element that if accepted though it flies in the face of reality allows the rest of the story to unfold organically and with suspension of disbelief. In the classic film Jaws  one has to ignore actual shark behavior but beyond that the film proceeds logically. With this film the one gimmie should be the alligator behavior but sadly the writers and directors instead ask the audience to accept impossibility upon impossibility particularly as the movies crashes through its third act action. Detailed and graphic tissue damage that the characters, both Haley and Dave, sustain from attacks are minimized beyond belief for the sake of keeping the characters mobile, active, and capable of impressive physical feats for even uninjured persons. The first time the filmmakers ignored the realistic effect of a compound leg fracture, I simply groaned and accepted it, the second I silently growled in frustration, and by the climax I needed to stifle actual laughter.  In addition to the grossly under-valued physical damage the characters nearly ignore, the third act also suffers from contrived coincidences with valuable and critical equipment literally floating to the characters in their moment of dire need. As an additional note, a category 5 hurricane has sustained winds exceeding 157 miles per hour and there will not be rescue helicopters flights in such conditions.

Overall I found Crawlunworthy of the timer I spent watching it and I took solace in knowing that as part of my weekly three movies from the theater chain’s subscription service it cost me no extra money. For others, with less sensitive suspension of belief, this movie may turn out to be a fun roller coaster ride, an exciting summer popcorn movie, but for me it was not.

Share

Movie Review: Midsommar

Writer/director Ari Aster the creative forced behind last year’s Hereditary  is back with his sophomore feature film project Midsommar. People who are looking for a horror film in the vein of slashers, monsters, and action are likely to be disappointed with Aster’s slow-burn builds, languid deliberate pacing, and long-take, carefully choreographic photography however those who are enamored with psychological and sociological themed horror such as the originalThe Wicker Man  are likely to find something on Midsommarthat will appeal to their tastes,

Midsommar  centers on Dani ( Florence Pugh) and her disintegrating relationship with Christian (Jack Reynor.) Christian is already searching for a way to end the relationship when a familial tragedy shatters Dani leaving her grief stricken and emotionally vulnerable. Six months later Dani and Christian along with their friends Josh (William Jackson Harper) and Mark (Will Poulter) are invited to vacation and enjoy the mid-summer festivities at an isolated commune The Harga in northern Sweden by their exchange student friend Pelle. Once at the Harga subtle cultural conflicts slowly building between the guests, now including a pair of romantically invested UK students, and the residents of the commune. The guests used psychoactive drugs recreationally while the residents consume them for religious purposes, Christian and Mark want to study the commune for their academic advancement, while for the residents their way of life is part of an ancient and sacred tradition, and Mark sees sexual activities as something of pure pleasure the commune considers it more of cycle of life never foregoing the goal of procreation. These conflicts are not expressed in boisterous loud scenes of shouting but rather build layer by layer a growing sense of dread as the two cultures move irreconcilably towards a devastating final reveal. Dani, unlike the others, starts finding a place and a people that see her emotional injury and, though often concerned about the mysterious events that hint at darker motivations and truths, she discovers an acceptance and even a form of healing that Christian has been unable to give. As the film shifts from the second act into the third the plot descends into revelations, betrayals, the final dissolution of Dani and Christian’s relationship and culminates with Dani’s final resolution the more traditional horror film aspects emerge.

With strong echoes of The Wicker Man, which for those of you in San Diego will be playing soon for one day only at the Ken Cinema, Midsommar  is a movie that invites deep consideration and that for many will haunt their thoughts long after the final credits have vanished from the screen. Gorgeously photographed by Pawel Pogorzelski the film manages a continuously building atmosphere of dread and unease in a setting that has no period of true darkness. It is the rare horror film, psychological or otherwise, that attempts much less succeeds at mood building without a heavy reliance on dark deep shadows. The score is a different sort of musical accompaniment and I do not have the required background in knowledge or terminology to adequately explain it but in terms of mood it fit perfectly, enhancing the film’s emotional subtext without telegraphing it in broad blatant techniques. (Though that aspect of my experiences was marred by the deep bass rumblings from the Imax auditorium next tour ours screening Spider-Man: Far From Home.)

The cast is uniformly terrific, playing each character with credible depth and complexity. I want to make a particular note of William Jackson Harper perhaps best known as Chidi on NBC’s hit show The Good Place. Once again Harper is playing a character with a strong academic nature but through the strength of the script and Harper’s with subtle but effective physicality, I never once had any echoes of his role from that show.

Over all I loved the film and it has elevated Aster into a place where I will go see his next film without any other inducements required. Midsommaris a film that is not for everyone, but if you found Hereditary  or The Witchcompelling viewing then you should waste no time in seeing this movie.

Share

Movie Review: Spider-Man: Far From Home

The first post-Avengers: Endgame  Marvel Cinematic Universe movie Spider-Man: Far From Home  opened this weekend and reviewing it will requires spoilers for Endgame,  though I will refrain from spoilers for Far From Home  as much as possible.

Set five years after the events in Infinity War  and shortly after the return of the ‘snapped’ and after Iron Man’s sacrifice ending Thanos’ threat Far From Home opens with Peter Parker trying to resume his abnormal life as a high school student, he and all his emotionally relevant friends lost five years due to the Snapture (thanks to NPR’s Glen Weldon), while trying to cope with the loss of Tony Stark.

A new threat appears on S.H.I.E.L.D.’s radar when monstrous forces called elementals begin appearing around the world and the sole survivor from a parallel universe Quentin beck where these forces destroyed the Earth is recruited to save this version of Earth. With the major former Avengers either dead, aged out, crippled, or unavailable, Nick Fury of S.H.I.E.L.D. conscripts Peter Parker to help Beck save the world.

Peter wants nothing more than to leave the world saving to others, enjoy his high school class’ European Vacation, and possibly get closer to his crush Mary Jane Watson, but the continuing and escalating threat upset Peter’s plans and being the heir apparent to Stark’s mantle carries with it a level of guilt and responsibility that test’s Peter’s character.

Spider-Man: Far From Home  has exciting action set pieces, fine acting, deft, quirky, and often funny dialog but it lacks a strong story leaving it in the midlist of MCU movies. Unlike the last outing for Spider-Man where a padded plot dragged down the pacing this time the flaw is the central conceit of Peter’s motivation as character. As a protagonist Peter is simply far too passive.

In the Western tradition stories are constructed around a protagonist who desires a goal, something the protagonist much work to achieve, and the obstacles that the character most circumvent, defeat, or overcome to achieve their objectives. What your character wants and why they cannot simply have it is the core of a story’s plot. In this movie Peter wants to be left alone. He wants to go his vacation, not be ‘Spider-Man,’ and explore his relationship with M.J. Peter’s objective is not to do the thing the audience is here to see him do and as such the plot must repeatedly intervene and force Peter back onto the track that leads to dashing heroics and exciting action. In short he is pushed and pulled by the plot rather than driving the plot himself with his actins, choices, and needs for an objective. When the script makes the turn from Act 2 to Act 3 it finally creates enough pressure that Peter can no longer hide from his responsibilities and his objectives changes and for the final act he is driving the story, but this transformation comes too late to prevent the majority of the movie from being subjected to rudderless piloting.

How much this passive protagonist bothers someone will be a matter of individual taste. As I have mentioned this time the film’s running time doesn’t feel padded and each action set piece has a strong narrative purpose. There are plenty of humor and character moments to carry a viewer along but for me the lack of a plot driven by Peter’s needs drags the final product down into the mid-tier range of MCU movies.

Share

Further Thoughts on Aladdin 2019

So my mind keeps circling this year’s release of Disney’s Live-Action version of Aladdin.It feels to me that the movie just didn’t quite work and as a writer I want to dissect the corpse and find out why. I may not have found the primary cause but I think at the very least I diagnosed a serious complication and contributing factor.

In the 1992 release the character of Jasmine, Aladdin’s love interest, is principally a human McGuffin. The set-up of the story is that Jasmine, by law, must marry before she turns sixteen, as the only offspring of the ruling Sultan, Jasmine becomes the route to power. Her husband will rule and Jafar, the scheming adviser/sorcerer, wants to marry her for that power while Aladdin, the good hearted ‘diamond in the rough’ wants to marry her for love and thus will wield that power more justly. Jasmine simply wants to choose for herself and not be ordered to marry someone she doesn’t love. Jafar and Aladdin have opposed goals, only one can achieve their desired end and as such the plot has conflict between its two poles of good and evil. Jasmine has no song in the 1992 version because there is very little she is trying to achieve and very little character beneath her surface motivations.

The 2019 release of the story has made critical changes to the plot. Jasmine is no longer forced to marry on any timeline, removing the ticking clock that helped drive the earlier version. Jafar, with somewhat deeper motivations, has plots to seize power without the requirements of a royal marriage, which removes the conflicting goal between him and Aladdin. The two characters are no long directly opposed ceasing to be well-defined protagonist and antagonist.

Complicating matter from a structural standpoint Jasmine has now been given her own goals and motivations and a song. She is presented as smart, capable, and with a burning desire to serve her people as a leader, but thwarted in this because of her sex. She wants the throne not for vain glory or to make the Kingdom a great power but because she wants what is best for the populace, placing her in direct conflict with Jafar. It terms of the plot Jasmine and Jafar are now our respective protagonist and antagonist.

This would be perfectly fine if  the script had been re-written with the dynamic had formed the spine of the story but the movie insists that Aladdin is the hero, he is the protagonist in a story in which his stakes are secondary when compared to other characters.

Look at the stakes for each character.

Jafar, failure means loss of position, imprisonment, or death because if you move against the Sultan and fail it will end badly.

Jasmine, failure means the people loss her leadership, her empathy, and she is consigned to a lifetime of watching an evil man ground the populace in the war plans.

Aladdin, failure means he continues his life of poverty. Aladdin’s stakes are improvement of his life or stasis; he stays where he is. No ticking clock, no disaster befalls him, not the sort of things the Jasmine and Jafar are facing.

To fix this they needed to either give Aladdin stakes that mattered as much as Jasmine’s or Jafar’s or they need to re-conceive the story with Jasmine as the lead, the protagonist, the hero.

Share

Movie Review: The Dead Don’t Die

It is said that when a genre cycle nears the end of the ‘life’ and the dramatic idea within that genre run dry the artists turn to comedy. I am not sure I buy that even as a general rule and I certainly do not buy in to that for the subset of horror movies built around zombies as flesh eating undead. 2004’s Shaun of the Dead  is often credited as a film that helped re-launch the zombie movie and its comedic nature is undeniable. An even older than that example is Return of the Living Dead  from 1986, a direct sequel to 1968’s Night of the Living Dead, a dark comedy, and the movie that forever implanted in popular culture the concept that zombies eat brains. So the release of this month’s zombie comedy The Dead Don’t Die  is not in my book a sure sign that the genre had reached its end. Though I will admit that finding really good zombie movies is always a difficult pastime.

Written and Directed by Jim Jarmusch the filmmaker behind the vampire movie Only Lovers Left Alive  The Dead Don’t Die  is a story of the zombie apocalypse as experienced in the small one horse town of Centerville USA. Roughly centered on Police Chief Cliff Robertson (Bill Murray) and police officer Ronnie Peterson (Adam Driver) the film follows a diverse set of quirky characters including Farmer Frank Miller (Steve Buscemi), Hermit Bob (Tom Waits), and new comer to the town and apparently a Scottish samurai undertaker Zelda Winston (Tilda Swinton) and a smattering of other famous actors and musicians playing smaller parts.

Unlike most comedies this movie is paced, quite deliberately, at a quite sedate speed. Things unfold in a slow steady progression and scenes play out with a languid sense of timing. Some of the humor comes from character and context but this film also plays with the a meta-narrative that has at least some of the characters seeming aware of the convention of zombies film and even through own more questionable reality. While there is zombie flesh eating action it is far from graphic in this presentation and Jarmusch replaces zombie blood and gore with a wispy black smoke effect that makes this a nearly bloodless horror film.  Near the resolution in the movie’s third act I was reminded of the Spierig’s brother low-budget indie zombie comedy Undead, but only is a passing manner due to a few shared story elements.

The Dead Don’t Die  is not a film for everyone. The humor is often understated, the pacing more fitting to a foreign film than a typical US theatrical release, and the meta-narrative keeps the viewer at distance, but conversely there are some terrifically understated performances, Bill Murray gives perhaps his quietest comedic line readings ever, several interesting ideas are presented on the nature of life versus unlife, and throughout the movie’s run time I was never bored as I was with the much faster paced Dark Phoenix.

Share

Movie Review: Dark Phoenix

One of the many signs that a movie is in trouble is when I am saying the lines of dialog before the character utter them. That usually indicates that the writers have taken the first and blatantly obvious choices in constructing their scenes. Throughout Dark PhoenixI predicted the characters’ dialog many times word for word.

The fourth installment in the re-booted X-Menfranchise Dark Phoenix  is the second attempt to adapt an iconic storyline from the source material onto the silver screen and while it is not the garbage fire that the most recent entry in the series was this movie managed to provoke big action boredom. Set in 1995 with an utter disregard to all of the characters’ ages, remember that the re-boot of this series started in 1962 by mixing mutants into the Cuban Missile Crisis and now thirty-three years have passed and none of the characters have appropriately aged, the X-men are now beloved by the world as heroes and saviors. Jean Grey, seen briefly in the previous installment, participates in rescue of a NASA shuttle crew and become empowered with a strange cosmic force.  Wielding her newly enhanced abilities Jean, for *reasons* (I’m sarcastic there nothing in the film is properly motivated.) engages in destructive behavior, assaults local police that responded to an unauthorized jet landing, and is then on the run from her friends and the law, all while being pursued by malevolent aliens who want her cosmic powers but are also somehow unable to possess them.

Of this film’s many great failings is the lack of a central story or even consistent theme. There are the bones and threads of an emotional and impactful story here about hubris, lies, and what happens when we start to believe our own press releases, but none of that is developed with any skill or tact. Characters speak in the plainest fashion, always revealing inner thoughts that most people obscure or in an overly expository explaining to each other what they already know. Things that might have been emotional reveals if held back as secrets as revealed in a straightforward linear fashion, draining later scenes of stakes and meaning. Characters are forced into the plot because the actors are under contract not because they belong in this story, yes I am looking at you Magneto, and set-piece battles happen because they are expected to happen at this act break.

Over all this film was dull, plodding, and wasted the talents of many fine actors, not worth your time at any price.

 

Share

Movie Review: Guardians (2017-Russian)

Not to be left out in the gold rush of Superhero film franchises Russian entered the fray with 2017s Guardians, an answer to Marvel’s The Avengersthough with even less set-up than DC’s Justice League.

In the film’s backstory, during the Cold War, for you youngsters out there a period from 1947 through 1989 when the world’s superpowers the USA and USSR stood ready with nuclear annihilation in their bitter rivalry, the USSR experimented on people, creating the Guardians, super-powered individuals. After the Soviet’s collapse these people dispersed to the four winds, losing themselves in the vast terrain of the Russian Federation. Simultaneously a competing Cold War project to protect the motherland, which focused on mechanical powers created by the mad scientist August Kuratov, succeed in giving Kuratov the ability to control any machine. Now Kuratov is back and bent on world domination. With the military’s vast forces neutralized by his ability to usurp control of all their weapon systems it is up to Major Elena Larina to locate and reunite the Guardians in the hopes that thy can defeat Kuratov.

As a set up that doesn’t exactly suck, but the movie Guardians,  suffers from both a lack and over abundance of character issues to create a compelling plot. The film seems to have no central character to act as a point of view and with a brief running time of a mere 88 minutes it simply can’t explore all the set-ups that it attempts to utilize. There’s the question, where have the Guardians gone? Well, that’s knocked out in a fast montage of computer searches and rapid-fire location changes as Major Larina seeks and recruits the four members. Instead of any tension the sequence becomes route exposition and introduction. Each of the Guardians presented in the film have deep character issues, but without the focus on any particular character all of the issues are given short shrift and thus come as flat and uninteresting.

The movie picks up in the third act with a climatic battle against a villain atop a tower in a metropolitan center surrounded by a force-field with the Guardians having to learn to fight and work together to save the world from domination.

Overall this was slightly less than passable with much missed promise.

Share