Author Archives: Bob Evans

Story Construction in Two Rules

There are a lot of factors in good stories and good writing so it goes without saying that you need more than two ‘rules’ but I do think that keeping this pair of elements in mind you will be well set on a path for making tighter stronger stories.

Rule 1: The character must want something that is difficult to obtain.

This is the rule that will drive the plot. What the character wants can change as the plot evolve and situations force the character onto new paths, but there must be something that the characters wants so badly that it becomes a need.

Rule 2: The character wants the wrong thing.

This is the rule that drives the character arc, the emotional heart of the transformation that will force the character into new growth or their final destruction. What I mean by ‘the wrong thing’ is that the character at the start of the story has a worldview that is going to be challenged and found false or wanting and by the end of the story the character will have transformed by taking on a new world view. What the character wanted at the start of the story is driven by that old worldview and what they achieve at the end is a synthesis of their growth and new worldview at the story’s end.

Share

Is ‘Moscow Mitch’ Unfair?

Recently Mitch McConnell GOP Senate Majority Leader blocked from coming to a vote via unanimous consent two Democratic bills aimed at tightening US Election security from foreign manipulation. Broadly one would have required paper records of each vote and the other would have required campaign reports attempts by foreign nationals and power to influence the election. For blocking these bills, and because the Russian interference in the 2016 that sought to assist Donald Trump in both the primary and the general election is ongoing many on the left gave McConnell the nickname ‘Moscow Mitch.’

Granted it did not look good but that may have been the point, in politics it is a common tactic to advance a proposition simply to force the opposition to vote it down or block because on the face it looks terrible when in fact there may be legitimate reason to defat any particular bill. Given that all of the recent foreign interference has benefits or sought to benefit the Republican Party it can’t be dismissed that at this time election security cuts against the GOP’s self-interest.

I poked around on general news, liberal, and conservative sites looking for various perspectives on these bills and McConnell’s action blocking them. Over at National Review I found a piece defending McConnell and that it very illuminating.

Rich Lowry’s defense of Leader McConnell falls into three major premises.

1) The American system localizes election and it is wrong for the Federal government to dictate to local officials how to conduct elections.

2) Broad legislation, law, and regulation are ‘more likely’ to capture minor and innocent transactions and incidents.

3) McConnell has already passed 380 million dollars of election security assistance.

In our federal system our election system is highly localized, so on that point Lowry is correct. Our decentralized election system has even been touted as a safeguard against electoral tampering because manipulating 8000 individual election authorities is vastly more difficult than attacking a single national system. And that would be argument for the safety and security of a decentralized system IFwe elected our president with the popular vote but the Electoral College turns that strength into a weakness. A bad actor seeking to manipulate our presidential contest doesn’t need to attack every election district in every state but rather merely a handful of districts in perhaps as few as one or two states to change the results of the election. Insisting on localism in this context means we are pitting the Cleveland Registrar of Voters against the combined might of the Russian Federation’s Security apparatus. This requiresfederal intervention.

To Lowry’s second element there is even less supporting his position. It is certainly a good ‘rule of thumb’ to consider how vast sweeping regulations and generalities interact with reality but when the focus is on a particular piece of law or proposed law then it becomes a requirement to showwhere it is overly broad and how that is counter-effective and Lowry’s doesn’t even attempt to do that. He spouts a platitude as though it is an argument and moves one.

Lowry’s third defense is also quite weak. 380 million dollars may sound like a lot of money to average people dealing with rent, utilities, and the minutia of life but in terms of large-scale projects it is a pittance. The reported budget for Avengers: Endgame  is 350 million dollars and certainly securing out elections if vastly more critical than even a very entertaining Hollywood feature. Remember there are about 8000 election authorities in the United States and 380 million dollars works out to each one getting less than $5000.  McConnell’s ‘assistance’ is barely more than lifting a finger.

Still, calling him ‘Moscow Mitch’ fair?

No, because his slavish devotion is to GOP power and not Moscow. If the Russians suddenly switched to helping the Democratic Party McConnell would become consumed with stopping them.

What we can say is that McConnell with his devotion to his party’s power at all costs and an utter disregard for all our political norms history and his willingness to advance our enemies cause if it helps his is that he is no patriot.

Share

Quick Thoughts: The Lion King (2019)

Not a full review but just a few of my impressions about Disney’s remake of the Animated classic.

The technical achievements are mind blowing. It is not a live action movie but a photo-realistic CGI animated film and the photo-realism is spot on. There were very few moments, and those were fleeting, where I felt the computer’s presence but rather this looked, utterly, like a menagerie of African animals acting on the savanna. The lions’ fur during rain was particularly impressive.

The technical artistry was also the feature principal failing. As many reviewers have notes the animals’ feature are so faithfully reproduced that emotional expressiveness is absent. The angled od the head and movement of the ears are the most overt indicators of a character’s emotional state, more than any other animated feature this one relies heavily, too heavily, on the vocal performances. (Which were fine but the lack of emotional eyes damages the film.)

Why of why did they have to screw-up my favorite song?

I adore the original’s rendition of Be Prepared, and while I have never heard Chiwetel Ejiofor sing (One of these days I am going to have to rent Kinky Boots) the spoken and broken cadence of this version of my favorite song grated.

While I am on the subject of the villains, the revising of the plot to elevate the hyenas as more active while devaluing Scar’s agency did not work at all and muddled a perfectly balanced plot into one that while not a mess lacked a strong dramatic though line as in the original.

 

If you are a fan of the original this movie is not really worth the time.

Share

A Strange Dry Period

When it comes to my writing productivity this year has been curious. Earlier I sold my first novel to Flame Tree Press and that was exciting, thrilling, and informative. I look forward to the stages and processes yet to come, the cover reveals, and ultimately the book’s release early next year.

Now, you would think having achieved something that has been long sought after, fought for, and dreamt about would be a vitalizing incident spurring an explosion of creativity and output but it’s been rather the opposite. Every short story I attempted for months following the contract stalled and crashed. It seemed that I could start a story but following through to completion seemed impossible.

Last moth as we hurtled towards the deadline for the quarter for the Writers of the Future contest, something I will remain eligible to enter and win until early next year when the novel is published, it seemed I was going to have to skip entering as none of those accursed shorts would land instead of crashing. Then, with less than six days before the deadline a new idea burst in my skull. At first I had thought to rewrite an idea from many years ago but sudden inspiration transformed it into a new concept with wholly new themes. A furious several days passed and the story, this time, behaved, coming to a dark and hopefully satisfying conclusion.

Since that submission my creative energies have been growing and I have begun work on a new novel, tacking for the first time in a novel length work an alien as a central character. It would seem that the strange and mystifying dry period that followed signing the contract has ended.

Share

Movie Review: Once Upon a Time in Hollywood …

Quentin Tarantino’s films for me are a hit or miss affair, some I adore, some or passable, and with some my suspension of disbelief is shattered rendering them pointless. Of the nine movies directed, so far, by Tarantino, my favorite three arePulp Fiction, Inglorious Basterds, and now Once Upon A Time in Hollywood ….

Once  is centered on the relationship between Rick Dalton, (Leonardo DiCaprio) a television westerns actor whose career has begun to fade and his Stunt Double/Driver/ and friend Cliff Booth (Brad Pitt.) Set in 1969 a period where the former glory of Hollywood had faded away with the collapse of the studio system in the 1950s and just before the rise of personal filmmaking of the 70s that would usher in the likes of Scorsese, Coppola, Lucas, and Spielberg, With his western series Bounty Law  canceled Rick has turned to guest appearances on other shows, often playing the heavy, as his prospects continue to dry up while Cliff, dogged by an unresolved scandal, finds work as a stuntman difficult to book. In this dying and decaying period with the blush vanishing from the Free Love Hippie movement Rick finds himself suddenly neighbors with Hollywood’s latest Golden Couple, Roman Polanski, still riding high from his smash success Rosemary’s Baby and his actress/wife Sharon Tate. Throughout the film the audience is given three storylines to follow, Rick’s struggle to remain relevant and find his voice again as an artist, Sharon’s satisfaction in his art and at the prospect of becoming a mother, and Cliff’s course crossing paths with the dangerous and murderous Manson Cult that has taken up residence on an abandoned western movie ranch.  The film’s final act deals with the tragic events that for many shattered Hollywood’s illusions of safety and privilege in a rapidly changing culture.

Tarantino has love been hailed and derided for his scripts’ ubiquitous cinematic and pop-cultural references and here with a subject matter firmly set in the middle of that melting pop he does nothing to restrain those impulses. That said it is clear that this reflects a deep and committed love for movies and for this film the references and the nods and the adoration deepens the story’s reality even as the director takes significant liberties with the historical record. Even as the plot drives relentless towards an evening that has become seared in popular consciousness for it’s brutality and its horror Once  never loses sight of the essential humanity of its characters, both fictional and historical. In the end the resolutions is not so much about cults and mad insane violence as it is about the deep emotional bond between two men who have lived entangled in each other’s lives.

This film is not for everyone. For some the long diversions into the minutia of the character’s lives, scenes that simply illustrate their lived experiences without advancing narrative of ticking off plot points may seem to drag and bore but for me I could spend several more hours following Rick and Cliff as they navigate a difficult friendship and the industry’s ever changing structure. Like most Tarantino films when the violence does erupt it is bloody, visceral, graphic, and even somewhat cartoonish, however if your knowledge of the real events on that isolated drive give you hesitation about seeing this movie, I certainly felt that, set your concerns aside. This is a love letter to a lost period, to an art form, and not a celebration, veneration, or even exploitation of Manson and his ‘family.’

 

Share

Terrific Art, Terrible Person

As a consumer what do you do when the artist is a terrible person?

In this day and age when less and less of what was once considered ‘private’ become public and common knowledge more and more anyone who is idealized and lionized is revealed to have not just feet of clay but dark black hearts as well.

I am not speaking of just the abrasive personality, the demanding and tyrannical nature of their relations with coworkers and assistants but deeds that are criminal and often unforgivable. I need not give a detailed listing of the recent and distant scandals that reveals some artists, performers, and creators to be truly reprehensible people.

What should you do?

There are no easy or one-size fits all answers. To each of us lies our individual moral duty and obligations and as shepherds of our own consciences we have to find the answers alone, but I can share some of what guides me and perhaps that might illuminate for myself and other how to approach the difficult and fraught choices.

I have to ask myself does the art endorse, reflect, promote, or otherwise give support to the actions that I found reprehensible?

Kevin Spacey is a talented actor and apparently, yet to be proven in a court of law, a terrible person when it comes his behavior. Does his art endorse the sort of actions he has been credibly accused of? It doesn’t seem so to me.

It is easier separate the artist and the art when the art lies completely apart from the artist’s reprehensible actions, Polanski’s Macbeth is my favorite film adaptation of the classic play and has nothing to do with the man’s criminal actions. I can enjoy the filmmaking, the artistry, and still support the position that he deserves the jail time he escaped.

Share

Nazis, Socialism, and Madonna’s First Movie

It has been brought to my attention recently that there are still, and I imagine going on forever, people insisting that Nazis are actually socialists and by extension left wing politically. The arguments fail to convince me and I’ve laid out in other posts why I think the Nazi fall clearly on the right. What I find fascinating about this argument is contorted logics employed in services of preconceived conclusions; they are rationalizations and not reasons.

Back in 1985 I engaged in the strange habit of renting the worse movies I could possibly locate on VHS. A little mom-and-pop shop just around the corner from where I lived had the most interesting collection of odd movies with titles such as Hitchhike to Hell  and then one night the gem A Certain Sacrifice  appeared on the shelves. This micro-budgeted movie shot in 1979 and 1980 and looking as though the film stock was all of 8 mm wide included an unknown performer, Madonna. By the mid 1980s her stardom had exploded and the filmmaker capitalized on this by releasing his movie on home video. Thought Madonna attempt to stop the release she failed in the courts and I was treated to a truly terrible movie.

What does this have to do with the question if Nazis were or were not socialists?

After watching the film with my roommate one of the games I engaged in was arguing that A Certain Sacrifice  was not in fact a bad movie but a masterpiece of filmmaking rich with metaphor and symbolism. My arguments were artistically sound and of course utterly untrue. The fact that I could spin a consistent narrative that ‘explained’ all the bad film choices as something smart and creative did nothing to change the facts of the matter. The same is true in this political argument.

You can quote from the early years of the Nazi party to prove points, ignoring the uncomfortable truth that those elements were brutally eliminated during the night of long knives. You can construct logical arguments that proceed from a foundation that everything totalitarian is socialist and get to your preferred conclusions, but linguistic dexterity and slippery arguments do not change facts on the ground.

But how can we know the facts on the ground? How can we test this concept?

Easy, watch actual Nazis and see where they place themselves politically.

It is on the right.

People giving Nazi salutes election night 2016 were not bemoaning a loss.

People marching by torchlight and chanting ‘Jews will not Replace Us’ did not organize a ‘United the Left’ protest.

It was not the Democratic Party that found itself represented by an actual Nazi in the 2018 congressional elections.

Nazis nearly always self-sort to the right, their behavior betrays their natural placement on the ideological spectrum.

Share

Movie Review: Maleficent

With the trailers for Maleficent: Mistress of Evilplaying in theaters and online prompting some interest from me I decided it was time to see the 2014 feature starring Angelina Jolie.

According to the Wikipedia entry the script for Maleficentwent through 15 drafts and in my opinion it needed 15 more.

The movie is a retelling of Sleeping Beautybut centering the story on the original’s villain, Maleficent. Beginning with a ponderous voiceover narration that suffers from all the worst aspects of prologs the film laboriously goes through the motion of establishing its central characters motivation but devoid of any real characterization. A good half of the movie is spent just establishing elements that have no emotional weight. This is made worse by sub-standard CGI that extends the ‘uncanny valley’ from characters to actual valleys, as the virtual sets never allow a full suspension of disbelief.

Perhaps most damning is that Maleficent herself is a terribly passive character. Yes they give her villainy a reason but she has no goals in the film, there is nothing that she is desperate to achieve and no consequence of failure. By the time the film rolled into its third act I found it impossible to care about the curse, the fairies, or anything at all taking place on the screen. And rather than give us an evil character with understandable motivations and goal Maleficentends with redemption making the transition to the sequel problematic. As with Alien 3you can only get to the sequel by insisting that anyone who did invested emotionally with the previous story were suckers. A sequel should never put the audience in the position of having to discard what they cared for in the previous installments.

Share

Complicity, Willful Ignorance, or Denial

The most recent racist attacks by President trump are not the straws that broke any camel’s back. Politically accepting that Trump has a multitude of racist bones in his body was established when he took that escalator ride down into the Trump Tower Lobby and proclaimed Mexican people as ‘criminals’ and ‘rapists’ while reserving the privilege of assuming that ‘some’ were good people. The reports of Trump’s deep racial animosity stretches back throughout the entirety of his public life, including Federal law suits over his refusal to rent to African-Americans, and the ‘understanding’ of his casino floor managers that when trump visited to move African-Americans employees out of sight.  Nothing he has done as a businessman, public figure, or elected servant has contradicted this portrayal. Simply put, Donald Trump is racist.

The question is what do the rest of us do about it?

For independents and members of the Democratic Party this answer is obvious, oppose him, fight to defeat him, and drive him from the public square. But that’s a goal the Democrats and many others would have regardless of Trump bigotry.

For Republicans the challenge is far more consequential and very few appear to have the moral courage to meet it. At this date if one is unwilling to denounce and defeat this vile racism then you are left with just three options.

Complicity – you are a part of it. Your silence and refusal to take action make you into an ally in his smears, slanders, and bigotry.

Willful Ignorance – you ignore the facts, studiously avoid learning any of the man’s history, and pretend that in this media saturated environment you somehow have remained unaware of the truth.

Denial — One of my favorite authors once wrote ‘Mankind is not a rational animal but a rationalizing animal.’ This is never truer then when people invent fantastic leaps of logic in order to avoid the simplest and most obvious of conclusions. If you are finding byzantine explanation for how these numerous and repeated attacks are not ‘really racist’ congratulations you are in the state of Denial.

So which state is yours?

Share

Revisiting: Train to Busan

Last night I completed a two-night re-watch of the South Korean zombie film Train to Busan.I originally reviewed this movie January 2017 when I had the good fortune to see it in a local micro-theater. At that time I gushed over the film and for Christmas my sweetie-wife gifted me with the Blu-ray edition. So, how does it hold up two years later? Have scales fallen from my eyes and have flaws now made themselves suddenly prominent in the bit of cinema?

No.

Off the top of my head and without digging deep into the history of zombie movies I’d place this film within the top three zombie movies of all time. Mind you I am speaking of quality and not importance. Train to Busan ranks along side the 1978 Dawn of the Dead  and 2004’s Shaun of the Dead as zombie movies that transcend genre and move into the realm of art. Where Dawn  using it’s time to slyly comment on consumerist culture and Shaun  uses it’s rom-com format to address life when it is unexamined, Train with its passengers slicing through the various strata of Korean society, comments on the nature of individuals and their relationship to each other, most exemplified by the estrangement between the lead and his daughter, but the theme echoes in interactions throughout the cast with no character, not even the self-serving and villainous business man, lacking in human depth and need for connection with those they love and cherish.

Re-watching the film I am thunder-struck by the performances. Not simply the leads, who are all fantastic, but every small part if played with the life and vitality of a serious performance. Simple expression and single lines of delivery suggest complex interior lives for characters that are never even granted to the honor of being named. Not to be overlooked are the amazing mime performances of the actors portraying the zombies. Twisting and contorting their bodies the actor exude a sense of inhumanness that turns what had become a tired and standard screen monster into something that again can truly terrify.

By the heart wrenching ending of the film I was thoroughly engrossed in the characters fully invested emotionally, Train to Busan  is a fantastic film.

Share