Author Archives: Bob Evans

Thanksgiving

I’m not a religious person so this is not a time for me to give thanks and praise to an anthropomorphic deity; however we can still be thankful for the good thing and fortunes that have come our way.

First and foremost of course is my sweetie-wife. Meeting her in Boston September 2004 was truly one of life’s more fortunate turns. I have been and continue to be very happy with her in my life.

I am thankful for the good and loyal friends I have. They make up my west coast family and truly make life more enjoyable.

I have a good job with good pay and I work with good people. Few can truly say all of that, plus I help people at work. I know that right now I am making some people’s live truly better.

I sold a second story, proving that the first was not a fluke.

I thankful to have watched a good friend, Gail Carriger, publish her first novel. One that came up and out of the slush pile. I am so very happy for her.

Aside from a few minor problems under control with modern medication, I am in good health and in good spirits.

I have more and more visitors to this site and I am thankful for each and every return visit.

I hope your lives are going as well and as happily.

Share

It could have been worse…

So last weekend I was playing around with the Garage Band software that comes with my apple computer.

Now understand that I have absolutely no training or education in the fields of music or musical composition. Anyway Garage Band has loops of music pieces that you can lay down as track. You can mix the tracks and do all sorts of interesting things with them I had laid down a drumbeat and was playing around with other pre-recorded instrumental tracks.

The results were apparently not to my sweetie-wife’s ear. Her comment was that I should leave music to ‘professionals.’

I take it as a consolation that she has never said a similar thing about my prose.

Share

Crossed Fingers

For the last year or so one of my sweetie-wife’s lovebirds has been acting strangely. He will tilt his head back until it’s laying flat along his spine. Lately his balance has gotten bad and he become quite unsteady. Today my sweetie-wife learned that this condition is called’stargazing’ and where we had assumed it was because the bird was aged it could be from other factors.

Tomorrow she is taking the bird to an avian vet and maybe, if the stars align just right, we make the little fellow well again.

Share

Sunday Night Movie: Night Of The Living Dead

night_of_the_living_dead This is a movie I listed as one of the most influential horror films of all time, George A. Romero‘s Night Of The Living Dead. This is the film that forever changed what we consider to be  zombie, and yet when George Romero made the movie the one word he never used in the script was zombie. The monsters were always called things, or ghouls.

Before this film any movies about zombies generally dealt with them as though they are from Caribbean myth, the reanimated corpses of the recently dead that serve the wishes of an evil wizard or priest. In White Zombie they are laborers making a sugar cane plantation work, in other films armies of the dead are used, but always there is a controlling agency that is the source of the scourge with understandable if somewhat irrational motivations.

With Night Of The Living Dead (Originally titled Night Of The Flesh Eaters.) Romero created a new monster, one that everyone else referred to as a zombie and that in end supplanted the Caribbean zombie as the de-facto zombie legend.

In terms of filmcraft, this film is a flawed film suffering from a lack of skill in the writing and direct through limited budget and effect capability. If you watch this film looking for quality film making you will be disappointed. What this film had, especially for its time (1968) was shock value. Compared to the horror films of of the 60’s this is an in your face gore-fest. The film is simply relentless in his ferocity. At this time other films were satisfied with smear of blood for gore, while Romero took the audience up close to entrails eating ghouls. The film was also ground breaking in the casting of a black man in the heroic lead. At the time when race riots were breaking out and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr was being assassinated, to have a black hero ordering about a white man and slapping a hysterical white woman was simply unparalleled.  It is to Romero’s ethical credit that he saw nothing ground breaking in this. He has made mention in numerous interviews that the actor, Duane Jones, got the part simply because he was the best actor who read for it.

The film’s tones is also more like something from the 70’s than something from the 60’s. Its futile ending reflects the growing cynicism and fatalism in american society.

Of course the films lasting influence was with the creation of the new screen monster, the zombie. After this movie zombies became self-motivated — usually only by hunger — relentless hordes of undead. They were freed of the slavery imagery and instead became an all-consuming mindless crowd. Eventually zombies as a monster factionalized as new filmmakers tried new ways to invigorate and revitalized the concept (If I can be pardoned for using the term in relation to the undead.) Dan O’Bannon gave us smart and indestructible zombies in Return Of The Living Dead, — which is actually a sequel to Night Of The Living DeadZack Snyder gave us fast zombies in the remake of Dawn Of The Dead,  and Danny Boyle gave us viral zombies in 28 Days Later. There have been others cause the zombie genre is not dead, but forever undead and ready to bite, however they all owe a debt to George A. Romero and nine friends who wanted to make a monster movie.

Share

Movie Review: Dead Snow

DeadSnow08Today a friend and i went downtown to see the Norwegian film, Dead Snow. The image to the left really tells you most of what you need to know about this movie before going to see it. Its about Nazi Zombies, in winter, and  in bad weather.

The core plot fo the film is simple. A group of college students — apparently all medical students — take a vacation into the Norwegian mountains for skiing and fun. Once there and cut off from help there as assault by the Third Reich’s finest, but in undead form.

So any connoisseur of zombie films will have this question pop to the top of their minds, What kind of Zombies are these?

First, these are fast zombies, capable of running down a sprinting person and chowing on their remains. Second, these are moderately intelligent zombies capable of using simple tools and weapons, but not the guns they have stashed about. However a knife wielding zombie is still a frightening thing to behold. Third these are not invulnerable zombies. A person does not have to inflect serious head trauma to down one of these zombies, machine guns to the torso would work just fine.

Now the question is what kind of movie is this? Sadly the answer is that this is a muddled film. The filmmakers swung back and froth from scenes of serious horror and revulsion to scenes of farce and camp. The result was a film without a definite tone and that caused the film to suffer. There are elements of this film that works  quite nicely, both with horror and with comedy, but total package never gelled together. It was entertaining, but only as a one time sunday afternoon kind of thing.

The film also suffered from basic story construction problems. The writers and/or the directors did not understand how to use establishment. If you are going to use a shotgun in the second and third acts it has to appear in the first act, or be rationally explained in it sudden presence. This is a very common establishment problem, but the filmmakers also managed to reverse this problem.  They established things in the first act that were never referenced or used again in the movie. If you tell me in the first thirty minutes of a story that one character can’t stand the sight of blood and another character is a claustrophobe then these should be important story points later one, not dropped to the way side like a forgotten package.

However, this was not the biggest flaw in the film. It is a spoiler so if you want to know, follow me through the jump. Otherwise just take it that this is a mildly entertaining, but flawed movie.

Continue reading

Share

Most Influential Horror Films

So what do you think are the five most influential horror films of all time? Not what are the best, or what are the most frightening, but the ones that had the biggest impact on films and on the culture as a whole?

 

Here’s my list

1) Dracula 1931

2) Frankenstein 1931

3) The Wolfman 1941

4) Godzilla/Gojirra 1954

5) Night Of The LIving Dead. 1968

 

If you think another film should be on this list, what is the movie and which film should be cut and why?

Share

Not a Happy Camper

The plans I had for tonight were destroyed by a pizzeria.

I had a two hour long training session at my day-job today. It was pretty interesting but the room it was held in was very frigid. An hour later my toes still were numb from the cold. I decided I wanted something hotter than microwave meal for lunch. Next door there is a pizza place, Regent’s Pizza. I studied their menu carefully and selected a couple of slices from a pizza that had no mushroom and plenty of meat. (Deep dish — which I am going to have to avoid from now on.)

After eating the pizza I found a slice of mushroom in the box. I was, as Prince Humperdink put it ‘most put out.’ I called and complained. They agreed that no mushrooms should have been in the pizza.

My stomach has informed me that there were indeed mushrooms present. I have spent this evening cramped and unhappy. Luckily I have not vomited, but that just means tomorrow will be my special bathroom day.

Joy oh joy

Share

One of the best books on Writing

first5This is going to be a short little post because I am utterly exhausted and will be climbing into bed in the very near future. It’s been a  busy week at work and I’ve continued to put in the hours on my novel, Cawdor.

What I want to talk about tonight is one of the best books I have read on how to be a better writer. The book is The First Five Pages by Agent Noah Lukeman. Many of the books on writing that I have read deal with broad concept level writing. How to construct plots, beginning middles and ends. That sort of thing and  that is very important. (Two books I would recommend are Writing The Breakout Novel by Donald Maass and Beginnings Middles and Ends by Nancy Kress.)

The First Five Pages should be on yourself with those two books. What Mr. Lukeman does with his book and help you diagnose and fix the detailed problems that get books rejected quickly. He gets down into the weeds of the matter and shows you how to tell a weed from a flower. The chapters are clear and concise, building on each other to lay open the complex task that is writing. At the end of each chapter there are work assignments to help you learn the lessons.

This book is exceptionally well written and deeply insightful. Cawdor is going to be  stronger novel because of it, If you are struggling with taking your writing to the next level, I think this book would help tremendously.

Share