Author Archives: Bob Evans

Head ache Log

about 8:30 I started getting photophobic, with normal room lights seeming very bright. This is usually the precursor to a migraine for me. I does with 1/2 a dose of Rx.

No headache devloped and the photophobia abated.

Share

Brief Comments

Not feeling at my best right now. I’m not having a headache but it is a possibility.

There may not be a Sunday Night Movie thisweek, we shall see.

I do want to say if you love SF and geek culture then you absolutely should see Paul. I saw it this morning with my sweetie-wife and Love the entire film.

 

Share

Headache Log

03/16/2011

about 7:30 began getting a headache as I watched a film which heavily used fish-eye lens and fast camera motions. Took 1 does of rx.

by 9:30 headache free.

Share

Headache Log

My doctor has asked that I keep a headache log. Seems to me that the databasing of my blog makes for a natural log. So unles my headaches interest you I would advise skipping any post with this title.

03/15/11

Morning headache starting about 9 am, could be caffeine induced as I have had no caffeine this day. Took 1 pill of the rx, but it seemed to have little effect. By 3 pm the headache was completely gone.

9:30 pm headache returned, dosed again.

Share

Sunday Night Movie: Spider Man 2

This is going to be a short Sunday Night Movie post — I think — as my fingers are hurting and it’s been a real day for me.

Anyway I had today off — doctor’s appointment — and so I knew that length was not a factor in whatever film I selected last night, however my mood was quite up in the air making it hard to settle on a film. I stood at the case, sliding potential DVDs and Blu-rays out a bit, so they stood out from the rest, and when I had then all ready I’d decided from the smaller set. At least that was the plan. The moment i looked at Spider Man 2 I knew that was the film for last night. A film serious enough to feel meaningful in the dramatic points, light enough to suite my mood, and competent enough that I knew I would enjoy the full ride.

Of the three Spider Man film this is easily my favorite. It doesn’t have the heavy lifting and predictable structure of an origin film. (Really nearly all superhero origin movies have the same three part structure. 1- Introduce hero and background, see the powers come to the fore, 2-the hero speeds around the scenes tackling bad guys far below his pay level and rescuing people and cats, 3-a big bad equal to the hero arrises and we have the real test which of course the hero passes so we can get on to sequels.) With that work out of the way Spider Man 2 could concentrated on the story that they wanted to tell. Of course Spider Man 3 is a pile of chaotic plots and characters that is full of sound and fury and goes nowhere. (I own it on blu-ray but only because it came package with the  PS3.)

I loved everything about Spider Man 2, the production design, the special effects, the fights, the characters, the performances except the ending, that  bugged me a bit. Spoilers ahead.

The entire film is about the tension in the duality of Peter Parker/ Spider Man and the choices Parker has to face to resolve that tension, both as a hero and as a man in love. All well and good, handled well with drama, pathos, and comedy. At the end of the film Doc Ock has fashioned a fusion reactor that is self perpetuating and will soon go critical, break contained, and level half of New York City. Ock, return to a non-madness frame of mind tell Parker that there is no way to stop it now that is it self regenerating., then reverses himself and says that the fusion reactor, the power of the freakin’ sun, can be drowned in the Hudson River like a unwanted puppy. Ock sacrifices himself insisting he will not die a monster and taked the reactor into thr river himself, saving the city but dying in the process.

Keeping with the duality theme of the script the resolution should have turned on Peter Parker’s brilliance. For example, when told that the reaction cannot be stopped, Parker might have suggested making a breach in the contained to create a rocket, and that way the reactor could be quickly dispatched far from the city, exploding harmlessly up high. Doc Ock can still be the one to fly the thing, dying a man and not a monster, but it would have taken both Peter Parker’s brilliance and Spider Man’s abilities (beating Doc Ock back into his senses) to save the day. A nice unification after the division that Peter/Spidey  had gone through in this plot.

Other than that I have no fault or problems with this very fun superhero film.

Share

Movie Review: Battle Los Angeles

Despite the horror that is daylight savings time and the foolishness of of staying up late on the night that the time skipped ahead by an hour I got up this morning and with a pal went to catch the first screening for today of Battle Los Angeles, and latest Alien invasion movie.

I was pleasantly surprised and thoroughly enjoyed myself at the screening this morning. The plot is simple and mostly what you could have expected if you had seen the trailers. Aliens, apparently in a bad mood, making water landings around the world, just of the coasts of major cities, and then without any fanfare proceed to the shoot and smash portion of their package tour. While the entire world is at war and we get flashes of news and information about what is happening elsewhere, this movie like the title suggests, is about the battle in Los Angeles.

Aaron Eckhart plays Staff Sergeant Nantz, a career Marine who is now haunted by the ghosts of soldiers under his command that fell in the middle east. Tired, worn out and beginning to fail physically Nantz wants to retire. Eckhart plays the role wonderfully understated. This is a US Marine, he doesn’t cry and moan about his troubles, but you can see them in his eyes. Of course his plans for retirement are suspended when the aliens attack and he is assigned to a new platoon and green lieutenant for action.

I have heard people compare this to an alien version of Black Hawk Down, and I can understand where they are coming from with that idea. This is a gritty style of filmmaking with an focus on making the scene look, sound, and feel realistic. To my limited knowledge that got the military aspects of the story dead on. With an unsteady handheld camera and lots of fast editing the film conveys the chaos, confusion, and calamity that is combat.

One of the aspects of this film that I really applaud the writers, producers, and director for is that this is a very personal point of view. We follow the story by way of these Marines and never do we see Generals, Secretaries, or Presidents in the story. The story is about these characters in this fairly limited time frame.

That is not to say that this film is not without flaws. The science at one point becomes more than ludicrous abd worse yet it did not need to go that far.

Some years back, 1990 in fact, a small genre film named Tremors burst upon the scene. One scenes in Tremors has the main characters trapped on a rock speculating where the monsters came from. Each characters proposes a classic SF trick that has been used to explain monstrous beasts in other films, mutated animals, aliens, government projects, etc. What Tremors never did was as a film tell you where the monsters came from because it was unimportant to the story. Battle Los Angeles should have learned from that trick, instead they try to explain why the aliens are invading. Why is unimportant to our plot, that’s for people of a much high pay-grade than Staff Sergeant and it should have been left on the editing room floor. I personally rationalized away the ‘explanation’ as merely the blathering of network talking heads and not anything based on the films ‘reality.’

Aside from that there is nothing to cause even a moments pause in recommending the people see this film.

Share