Author Archives: Bob Evans

Another Spree Killing

Here we are again, another horrific incident when a man killed strangers in a terrible tantrum. This time the event took place in Toronto, this time the weapon used was a motor vehicle, but the dreadful results are the same.

Though I have not yet read it I am sure there are those who have already gravitated to the position that this undercuts the argument for gun control in the United States. While that position is not entirely without merit it is generally used only as a barricade the gun legislation itself as it is rarely, if ever, followed up by specific actions that might be taken to prevent these sorts of cowardly murders.

Conversely while ink and electrons are focused on the coward’s motivations, the senselessness of his hatred, and the toxic ideology surrounding his lethal tantrum this too rarely moves into any sort of concrete plan of action.

Tragically I think we have decades of the cultural calamity ahead of us. Stripping away the particulars of any single incident, the weapons used, the precise history this or that coward, reveals a deeper trouble in our culture. We are in a cultural phase change, like water going from liquid to ice the result to be something dramatically different. For too many people this phase change strikes at their sense of entitlement, identity, and social standing, all elements that human history has repeatedly demonstrated that people will kill over.

I wish I had some easy answer.

Share

Thoughts on Alien Color Perception

So I was watching a video on color television and it prompted a few thoughts. Now as many of you know monitor color comes from the additive properties of Red, Blue, and Green. Mix Red and Green and you get yellow, Red and Blue creates purple and mixed in the correct ratios every color can be generated from just Red, Blue, and Green. This works because in your eye you have ‘cones’ that are sensitive to those three colors but with a bit of an overlap, so that for example yellow light activates both the red and green cones in your eye, thus you see the yellow.

However the process is a little different the colors created by the RGB method. That monitors is not actually creating yellow light, but rather is emitting Red and Green light in a specific ration activating the red and green cones in your eye to the same degree that actual yellow light would have and your brain detects that level of activation and interprets it as yellow light, even though there is no yellow light present.

So if there is an alien that has a different method of color perception, a different mix of cones, or their vision system reads wavelengths directly, a human monitor would never appear to them in full color, but always in a mix mash of Red, Blue, Green.

This is something I will need to keep in mind as I craft stories with aliens.

 

Share

My Weekend

This weekend here in San Diego we host the 9th annual Kingdom-Con a gaming convention. Last year was the first time I attended and then only for a single day to scope it our and see what it was like. This year I purchased a full weekend pass.

1500 people attended the convention and they played role-playing game, card games, board games, toy based games, and miniature games. (And probably others that I never saw.) My sweetie-wife and I played mostly board and card games, though after She went home in the evening I stayed for more until midnight on Friday and Saturday including one role playing game session when the mechanic to determine if your character succeeded or failed at a task was pulling a block from a Jengatower. (I died first in that one.)

One game we played that I very much enjoyed was Nefarious, a comedic game of mad scientists creating insane inventions in their quest to take over the world. I also thought very highly of the Steve Jackson games Port Royaland Mars Attacks! The Dice Game.

Overall it was a pretty fun weekend.

Share

Comments Are Closed

Last week the President signed into law FOSTA/SESTA a piece of legislation hoping to curb sex trafficking but that aims for that goal by weakening a core prevision of the Internet.

In the 1996 Communication Decent Act one provision, Section 230, basic laid out that a hosting website could not be held liable for what other parties posted on that website. If an act of libel occurs on a website such as Facebook it was not Facebook that faced legal peril but the person who placed the information on the web. This was a necessary update as things like libel laws had grown in an environment where publication was complex, expensive, and there for acted as its own gatekeeper.

In order to go after scum that was using internet ads, personals, and other posting to traffic people coerced into the sex trade, FOSTA/SESTA makes an exception that hold the hosting sites responsible for the ads and such that they host. Overnight personal ads have vanished for most of the Internet. In theory this legislation is used only for sex trafficking but government powers in theory are often quite different when placed into practice. A number of sub-reddits have already vanished and I have heard reports that a number of dating sights have also gone dark. Sites that were principally about people making connections and not prostitution, but small site with limited resources that cannot fight any sort of legal battle. Massive companies such as Google, Twitter, and Facebook can hire scores of lawyers to protect their interests but smaller one cannot.

Now my site has very few commenters, 90% or more of the comments come from just one person so my exposure is quite low. However there is another elements here, spam comments.

Since I launched my site and engaged an application to block spam comments there have been nearly 179,000 attempts to post spam as comments on my blog. Some have slipped through and I deleted them manually.

But what if some bad actors start using comments to traffic? Now the people hosting blogs on their personal sites could be held legally at fault. I cannot ignore that possibility and so I am closing comments indefinitely.

Share

Pilot Review: Lost in Space

It appears that no one still has cracked the code for producing a decent version of Lost in Space.  My friends and I sat down after board and card games and gave the first episode of the rebooted series a play. Sadly, the episode did not work for any of the three of us.

There are numerous technical and scientific errors throughout the episode and while I was willing to overlook a number of these, media SF does a terrible job of getting its science correct, the sheer number coupled with poor story telling crippled any enjoyment.

In the rebooted franchise Earth has suffered a disaster that prompts a mass exodus and colonization effort of which the Robinson family are but one that have left for a new lift on another planet. Okay that’s much better than the original idea of a single family founding a colony. The genetics of that colony are truly terrifying to comprehend. Now instead of a devoted couple John and Maureen Robinson are teetering on the precipice of divorce. Where many married couple barely managed to stay together ‘for the kids’ and often that is a bad call anyway John and Maureen plan to live the rest of their live in the hard existence of a new colony while dealing with their marital strife. The children this time around are presented a little more realistically a little more naturalistically and that is an improvement.  The colonization effort is sabotaged en route and the families are forced to abandon the main ship in smaller craft with the Robinson’s naturally getting the Jupiter 2. The survive the destruction of the mother ship, the reentry and crash on an alien world only to be confronted by a series of bizarre implausible threats that seem to occur simply because the screenwriters were unable to craft an actual story. Will, separated from the others, by chance encounters an alien robot that by saves their lives and provides a deus ex machinaresolution to the pilot’s initial threats.

The scientific and logical failings of the episode are numerous and here are a few that bothered my friends and me the most.

It is very curious geology that leaves a lake at a mountain’s peak.

It takes a LOT of heat to change water’s phase state, either going from ice to liquid or from liquid to ice.

If the Jupiter 2’s reentry melted the ice, so much that ship ends up fully submerged, then there is simply no way the Robinson’s could have scrambled across its hull.

The speed with which the ice became water and the water became ice was simply far too fast. It is a sad commentary that a movie like Volcanopossessed a better understanding water’s heat capacity than Lost in Space.

Magnesium in it’s natural state will be combined with other elements, must likely as Magnesium Oxide and the amount they harvested would be far too little to melt the volume of ice required.

The travel times to reach a distant peak harvest the ‘pure’ magnesium tumble from the glacier’s peak to the tree line all stretched credibility for within 5 hours.

Fire gives off a lot of heat and poisonous gas. Someone suspended above a raging out of control fire is quite literally toast.

Even if we set aside these and other issues with liberal amount of hand waving we are still left with a script that has very little story. Story flows from character and the choice that the characters make but this script is almost purely events and characters reacting. The characters are not driving the story but rather are driven by it and very little of what they do emerge from their nature. Repeatedly during out watching felt that events occurred only because ‘the writer said so.’ Events did not flow naturally from cause and effect but rather simply just happened. The filmmakers tried to hide the weakness of the script by presenting the events in a fracture narrative, but the juxtaposition scenes and flashbacks did not enhance the experience and played to no greater theme or atmosphere.

Overall this was a disappointing premier and I have better shows to watch with my limited time.

Share

The Return of Sensurround

Sunday night when I took in a showing of A Quiet PlaceI also experienced for the first time Dolby Cinema at the local AMC Theater. During the sound and visual system demo reel my mind harkened back to the classic Simpson take on the THX sound promotion that ended with Grandpa Simpson, after everyone else’s head had exploded scanner style, for the theater to ‘turn it up.’

Dolby Cinema certainly presented the images in a vibrant and highly detailed manner and the full spectrum audio sounded quite good, but when my seat shook with every bass note I could not help but to think back on Sensurround.

Back in the mid 1970s, as movie ticket sales declined and Hollywood continue to fend off new challenges from this thing call ‘cable t.v.’ and HBO one of the attempts to lure people back into theaters was Sensurround, a system of low frequency sound reproduction intended to shake the audience and create a more immersive movie experience. Developed and deployed for the big budget all-star disaster epic Earthquake, Sensurround was meant to mimic the sensation of the earth tremors. The process was employed for the big budget all-star war epic Midwayand less than big budget and not all-star terrorism inspired thriller Rollercoaster.Intended for the grand movie palaces that still existed at the time, Sensurround was ill suited for the coming of the multiplex and their smaller auditoriums.

With the threat of massive home monitors, 4K source materials, and elaborate sound systems Hollywood is continuing to battle for the hearts, minds, and wallets of America with systems such as Dolby Cinema as part of their arsenal.

I honestly cannot remember if I experienced Sensurround when I went to the theater for some of the above mentioned films.  Certainly do not remember my seats shaking like the old trip to the moon ride at Disney World. During the screening of A Quiet Placewhenever there would be a ‘jump scare’ my seat with vibrate. Instead of enhancing my experience it detracted from my immersion in the story, pulling me out of the story to remind me that I was sitting in a theater. (Albeit quite comfortably in a plush leatherette recliner.)

In the future I suspect I will be avoiding Dolby Cinema whenever possible.

Share

Movie Review: A Quiet Place

When I first viewed the trailers for this movie my expectation was that I was going to give it a pass. However upon several decent reviews from critics whose tastes fall close to mine own I decided to give the film a go.

A Quite Placebelongs to that sub-genre of horror films, the monster movie. Following in the tradition of Tremors, albeit without that films comedy, A Quiet Placenever explains precisely what the monsters are, how they came about, or even if they have anything beyond a predator’s cunning. The set-up for the film is simple, 89 days before the story’s opening scene mysterious monster appeared in the world and began slaughtering. Each movie monster needs a gimmick and this is that the monsters are blind, operating on passive sound detection to hunt. To survive means to be quiet. This is a movie without nearly any traditional dialog and not since Buffy The Vampire Slayer’sepisode Hushhas a story rotated so central around characters robbed of speech.

The film follows the Abbott family struggling to survive following civilization’s collapse in an environment where noise brings deaths. The Abbotts have an advantage in the scenario, their daughter Regan is deaf and the entire family is fluent in American Sign Language. This silent communication allows the Abbotts extraordinary coordination but is limited by line of sight and distance. When the characters communicate this way the film supplies subtitles. Great stretches of the story occur when character have become separated resulting in a film that carried by silent performances.

The filmmakers followed in the talents of Ridley Scott and refrained from showing the monster except in bit, pieces, and flashes until the climax of the action. Some have criticized the creature design are uninspired and while it hardly breaks new ground for me 0t did not spoil the film.

Though there are a number of credited screenwriters, usually the sign of a muddled and failing screenplay, A Quiet Placeclearly benefitted from Writer/Director/Star John Krasinaki’s vision for what he wanted to achieve, yielding a unified plot and atmosphere normally absent with so many writers. Emily Blunt stars as Evelyn Abbott and a couple of talented young actors round out the family besieged by ravenous monsters. The sequence of events is logical, the tension of taunt, and the characters are both realistic and relatable. Over all this is a good film and well worth watch. I think it benefits from a good theater experience and mine was a good one. The audience remained quiet, engrossed in the drama and the terror. If you wait for home video please make sure you watch this without undue interruptions.

Share

A Surprisingly Poignant Song from Weird Al

Now, this song is a cut from an album a few years back but I only recently got around to getting a copy for myself. Weird Al has had a terrific run as a humorist. His skills are so much more than ‘filking’ popular songs as a profession. He’s a writer, a director, and a man with a sharp eye for what the culture is up to at any particular moment.

This song. Skipper Dan has a pathos to it that just tugs at my heart. It isn’t a funny song, though it’s performed in that same style he will use for his fake love songs, but rather captures in just a few minutes the pain of a dreams that refuse to realize.

For all the dreamers that life has rolled under its’ impersonal tires, I give you Skipper Dan.

youtube placeholder image

Share

Thoughts on Sequels

As I have been working editing a sequel novel my thoughts have turned to the tricky nature of sequels in general. There is no place more in love with sequels that Hollywood. Given the sums of money on the line, both for production and potential profit, the idea of returned to a tried and true success if often one that movie producers cannot resist. Yet time and time again the sequels that are produced often are disappointments both commercially and as entertainment. Publishing has a similar thought relationship, albeit though with greater success than feature film in producing satisfying sequels projects. What is it about sequels that makes them so challenging?

The first impulse when a sequel is produced it simply to copy the parent project. You need look no further afield than Jawsand Jaws 2for an example that is nearly a platonic ideal of this principal. This tends to fail because what made the parent project so fresh and innovative simply cannot be fresh a second time around. We have literally seen it before and the desire for new ground, new stuff often overpowers the desire for a repeat performance. A successful sequel must break new ground, giving the audience something that they did not know that they wanted.

It is also possible to be too new and break so afield from the previous works that the audience simply has no interest and this new thing you have sold them dressed up as something it is not. This issue happens far less often than the rote copying of the previous work but it can be seen in Halloween III, which ignored the previous two films of the franchise in an attempt to establish the title as part of an anthology brand. The filmmakers wanted a wholly new concept but the audience wanted more of a slasher wearing a painted over William Shatner mask,

The third major way a sequel can go astray is to destroy the emotional investment the audience paid with the previous works. When someone truly loves a piece of narrative work they have infused that project with serious emotional capitol, paying with their apprehension and their concern for the stakes that characters faced. The emotional profit that they reap from the experience exceeds the tension that they endured during the narrative. Some sequels, in an attempt to break free of old patterns and find that elusive new ground, undo the rewards from the previous encounters and in effect tell the audience that they had been suckers for caring about the previous outcomes. A perfect cinematic example of this is Alien 3. Aliensa nearly perfect sequel that blended the established character with new situations quickly became a favorite but for many its sequel, Alien 3is thought of with scorn and hatred, Some people even insist that Alien 3ruined for them the previous film Aliens.I believe those harsh reactions are a direct result of the filmmakers, unintentionally mind you, telling the audience that they had been fools to emotionally invest in the well-being of Hicks and Newt. Every erg of emotional energy spent caring about those characters; feeling scared for those characters, cheering their survivals had been a con. Killing those characters in an off hand manner devalued the story of Aliensand naturally devalued any emotions wasted on Hicks and Newt.

Creating a successful sequel requires navigates these three major pitfalls, you cannot simply copy what transpired before, you cannot venture too far from what has been established, and you must not negate the emotional investment made in the previous projects.

Share

We Need a Strong National I.D.

First I am sorry that my weekday posts dropped off a bit over the end of last week and some of this week. My desktop computer had been throwing off issues and that consumed far more time than could be pleasantly endured. Things seem to be better now.

 

America is fairly special in the developed world in that as a major power it has no real form of national identification card or paper. The Social Security numbers, developed during the Great Depression, was never intended for that purpose and does that job particularly poorly. SSNs made people vulnerable to identity theft were fairly easy to forge, and their use as a default identification has imperiled millions. Until this year a person’s Medicare claim number was their SSN with an additional letter or letters tacked on to the front or the end as huge gaping security hole. (New Medicare ID numbers are rolling out now but it will take years for the industry to switch over.)

Our country needs a national identification system that secure, strong, and flexible. There is even at least one person running for congress advocating using public key encryption for a national ID card, not a bad idea at all.

There are a number of benefits that we would gain from a good national ID system.

1) It could Curtail Identity theft.

2016 saw 13 million people suffer some form of Identity theft with a cost to our economy of nearly 16 billion dollars.

2) It could curtail illegal immigration and illegal work practices.

Unauthorized border crossing are at a near all time low but even so it is in the public’s interest to keep all employment legal and by the regulations. Instead of focusing on the workers it would be a better use of the government’s resources to go after employers and executive skirting workplace laws and regulations.

3) It could help secure our elections.

In personal voting fraud is nearly non-existent but our national voting system is vulnerable to attack, as we have seen, and securing it can raise public confidence helping drive higher turn out and rob demagogues of one of their divisive tactics.

4) It could help better track ‘prohibited person’ and keep them from obtaining firearms.

A number of mass shootings and other maniacal events with guns have been perpetrated by persons who legally could not have purchased their weapons but we have a leaky system for tracking such people and a strong national ID could address that.

5) It could curtail Fraud and Waste

Government benefits, medical and otherwise, are prime targets for criminals seeking to bilk the public coffers. A strong national ID would make such fraud much easier to detect.

 

These benefits are only the ones off the top of my head. It is clear to me that a 21st century world power needs a 21st century system of identification.

Share