Author Archives: Bob Evans

Missed Opportunities in Marvel’s Doctor Strange

First off since I am writing about missteps in the latest MCU film clearly there will be mild spoilers about the story and how it unfolds. I will try avoid any if the major wow moments of the movie but I will be discussing the villain, his motivations, and ways that might have been handled by the writers. So, if you want to go into the film unspoiled skip this post.

 

Still here? Okay let’s get into it.

 

1-mads-jpg-crop-promo-xlarge2Mads Mikkelsen plays the film’s central villain, Kaecilius a man obsessed with avoiding death. For Kaecilius even the heat death of the universe is too soon, unlike Voldemort Kawcilius truly wants to live forever. Given the macguffins of the movie and such this is a perfectly adequate motivation, in fact the missed elements that I keep thinking about all revolve around this powerful motivation.

We are introduced to Kaecilius in a rather standard scene where he and his band of zealots murder a librarian to gain access to the spells that they believe can give them a shot of truly infinite life. The murder itself is typical bad guy behavior and right there is a missed illumination of Kaecilius’ character. They didn’t have to kill him, They overpowered him easily enough that they could have taken what they wanted without murder and Kaecilus could have left with a vague pronouncement that the librarian would die soon enough. At this point we the audience would interpret that as a villain’s threat about the coming nastiness, but later once Kaecilius’ real motivation were unveiled his words would become about character and not plot.

Second missed chance: Kawcilius’ zealots. His has a few followers, all expecting the same eternal life, and we are never given a chance to see who they are as characters. They end up being just nameless thugs for the heroes to overcome. Even a few lines of dialog would have gone a long way to revealing that these are sad desperate people propelled by their utter fear of dying. We could have that these were dangerous men and women who still were objects of pity.

Third Missed shot: Strange kills one of the Zealots and we get no reaction from Kawcilius. This was a man he was leading to eternal life. This was a man who trusted him to avoid this exact fate. This was someone who trusted him and now the up-start has killed him. I would have loved to have seen a scene where the villain of the piece lectures/berates the hero for his killing; for the villain to remind Strange of his oath to do no harm. Then we could have Mordo later try to convince Strange that he did the right thing and that would have set up a stronger conflict between Strange and Mordo and helped establish Mordo eventual fall.

I think these small changes would have opened up a deeper more character driven view of Kaecilius. But all this is more in the vein of ‘go write your own story, Bob’ than a just critique.

Share

Election Thoughts

Well. This was not the result I wanted. Mind you I have serious reservation about Hillary Clinton but I firmly believe that Donald Trump is the least qualified person to ever assume the office of President. But assume the office he will. The thing looks settled and there is naught to do but ride the dragon.

I thought he would never actually run. He Did.

I thought he would never win any primaries. He Did.

I thought he would never get the nomination. He Did.

I thought he would never win the general. He Did.

I think he’ll be a disastrous President. Perhaps I will be wrong again. The future we cannot know and we are living in interesting time.

To me the vital question is why did it go this way? Why did so many – but not a majority and not even the most – people selected him?

We don’t know the answer to that yet. We do not have the data. I caution everyone to wait and try to look around your filter. Do not go for the easy answer that confirms what you already believe. Dig down, question everything, and try to see it objectively. There is a mood in the country that neither the Republican and Democratic establishment have figured out but Trump did. It is vital we understand it

I have faith that our long established institutions are strong enough to withstand a Trump presidency. There may be rough waters and lots of trouble but I do think we will survive this and the arc of history will continue, with fits and starts, to bend towards justice.

The answer we do not know right now is what sort of president will he be? Will he be content with the pomp and pageantry, letting the GOP deal with all the boring details of running a government? In which case expect the Republican Agenda to sail through. Or will he be an active president and with strong idea, his own, about the right answers?

It is entirely possible that the GOP may truly regret letting the bull into their china shop.

 

Share

The Joy of a Successful Game

Today’s election day – go out and vote. Thus ends todays political posting.

This past weekend I ran my 5th Edition D&D game and had a success that truly made me feel good.

I had engaged in a bit of an experiment. The week leading up to the game I spent my lunches here at work writing journal entries for a game handout. The journal would cover decades, but only a scattering of entries remained. Some might contain vital clue, others might be mundane, and other might only serve at atmosphere. By the time the week ended I had written 3000 words of entries.

I used three different scrip fonts to represent the different ages of the fictional author and then I cut each entry apart onto its own piece of paper, mixing them up. (The journal was found in a old stone manor house, most of it missing the rest thoroughly out of sequence.)

Game night game and despite missing a few players we managed lift off. When they got the scraps with the journal entries I was quite nervous. I had written them in the ‘pantser’ style, simply making things up as I went along. Would the entries be interesting? Would the puzzle work? Would they have fun?

Judging by the players looked I would say it did work. They poured over the slips, one player quickly seeing the different fonts sorted them accordingly. As they examined the entries they read out disturbing, interesting, and passage that they believe to be clues. His worked out so much better than a skill roll a bullet point of data.

I wish all the players had been able to attend.

Share

Movie Review: Doctor Strange 2016

The year designation is essential as there has already been a made for television movie that was a pilot for a failed Doctor Strange program and a direct to video animated feature film of the good doctor. (And that’s not counting the 1992 Dr. Mordid – a direct video movie that was very nearly a Strange film but the filmmakers lost the right at the last moment and changed enough names and details to avoid a lawsuit.)

My two favorite characters of the Marvel comics continuum are Tony Stark/Iron Man and Dr. Stephen Strange. The MCU started off on the right foot with a terrific adaptation of Iron Man to the big, silvered screen and continues that tradition with this week’s entry Doctor Strange.

1-doctor_strange_2016-hdStephen Strange is an arrogant, brilliant, surgeon and when his life is turned upside down by a cruel twist of fate and he loses that which he cherished most he ends up on a voyage of self-discovery where he not only learns the value of things beyond self but becomes the Earth’s Sorcerer Supreme. The film is a competent and exciting addition to the MCU. If you enjoyed the other films in the sprawling saga of stories then you are likely to enjoy this one. If you are a fan of the character in particular then again this movie should work for you. Marvel is adapt at keeping the tone of their prosperities right where they need them. Serious enough that the stakes have weight but never forgetting to have fun along the way; a lesson WB and DC have yet to learn. This movie is an origin story but as the general public is unfamiliar with the ins and out of the Strange’s backstory I do not think that this is a misstep. It is presented in a established narrative fashion and perhaps they could have played with that a bit more. In a film where time itself proves to be fluid I think a non-linear approached might have been an interesting thematic take. That said, the straight forward narrative style works just as well.

One knock against the movie I have heard from different courses is that some people feel that Strange’s personal arc feels too much like a repetition of Tony Stark’s arc from the first Iron Man film; arrogant self-centered man suffers a tragic events, learns that his actions have consequences (or inaction in Strange’s part) and by the journey’s end he adopts the mantel of someone who cares about others. That’s fair as far as it goes but this arc is a well established story line, you could always look up Scrooge if you don’t believe me.

That brings be to the performances. Everyone did a good job, particularly Tilda Swinton taking a stereotyped role and giving it some life and depth, but the film either soars or falls flat on Cumberbatchs’s Strange. Just as with Robert Downey jr, Cumberbatch has tons of personal charisma and makes a character who could have been quite unlikeable one you truly care about. This is a very tricky thing for an actor to pull off. Stark, Strange, Scrooge, with all these characters if you don’t see beneath their surface and perceive a person capable of change and one you want to change, the story is going to fail. Either the change feels like it comes out of nowhere and for no reason or they never seemed that bad to begin with. Arrogant jerks are hard film characters to love and now Marvel, with excellent casting, has pulled it off twice. (Three times if you count Thor – but he struck me as immature more than jerk.)

This film is well worth the time for any Strange or Marvel fan.

Share

The Moral Dimension of The Election

The election is nearly upon us and while there are scores of policy and practical positions to influence a person’s perception of the candidates I think it is paramount to consider the moral dimension of this cycle’s choice.

 

I believe in human freedom, liberty, and equality. My application of these principles to specifics has, in the past and I am sure will continue in the future, irritated friends and strangers on both the left and the right. So be it. For my self-regard I have to apply the principles as I see them.

 

Donald Trump is not a proponent of freedom. He strikes me as a man more concerned with power than liberty, unless it is his own.

 

In 1989 students in Communist China gather in Tiananmen Square to protest for democracy and liberty. The Communists dictators sent in the military and slaughtered the peaceful protesters.

Donald Trump thinks the massacre was a sign of strength.

Donald Trump advocates for the USA to commit war crimes and torture.

 

Here is an iconic image of one brave man facing down the Communist tanks en route to Tiananmen Square. To vote for and endorse the candidacy of Donald Trump is to side with the tanks.

Photo Credit: AP Jeff Widener

Photo Credit: AP Jeff Widener

That I cannot do.

 

Share

Don’t Do Mix-and-Match Mythologies

1995 gave us the film The Prophecy, a rather forgettable horror film about the war of the angels coming to Earth as angels battle and search for the most evil soul born to humanity. The film had few redeeming qualities, and both of those were name Christopher Walken and the angel Gabriel and Viggo Mortensen as Lucifer. In the climax of the film the heroes turn to a Native American shaman to save the day.

This really bugs me.

I have nothing against anyone’s religious beliefs. Personally I hold that all religions look whacky from the outside. If yo want to craft a story around a religion and its mythos, go ahead. I love The Exorcist but I am in no stretch of the imagination either Catholic or Christian, doesn’t mean I can’t accept the ‘world-building’ for the lack of a better term to allow myself to submerge into the story. To me it is no different than accepting the ‘truth’ of the Force while you watch a Star Wars movie.

What bothers me is when you do a grab bag of mythologies, or ignore the clear implications of what you are putting down on paper or up on the screen.

If the Christian world-myth is true to the point where angels are moving amongst us calling humanity ‘talking monkey’ and are jealous of God particular love for us then that means the other religions are wrong, mere myth and superstition. Bringing in other magic to save the day is simply dodging the real story consequences of the choice you made in setting up the world.

Let me give you another example: Buffy The Vampire Slayer.

In the pilot episode Gliles, as exposition man, explained that ‘contrary to myth this world did not start out a paradise.’ The bible and its creation myth are false. Demons were here naturally from the start. Okay I can buy that, but why do crosses repel vampires?

Oh I see you in the back waving your hand in the air all ready to quote ‘Fright Night’ that is it about the faith of the person holding the cross. In the story Willow Rosenberg is at best an atheistic Jew and later she becomes a pagan, but hey that cross works just fine. Oh it’s the faith of the vampire now? You mean the faith of the demon that know the truth of creation, or the person corpse the demon is possessing? So a vampire sired from an Hindu would flee from a cross or not?

The fact is that vampire lore, coming from the Victorians, have them repelled by crosses and so did Joss, but the Victorians took Christianity as a given and Joss rejected it in his world-building.

I say if you are going to accept the cross’s action then you need to put on your grown up writer clothes and accept the rest of it as well. The same is true for whatever real-world myth or religion that forms the factual basis for your fiction. You need to know it and own it, but please do not treat the world’s religions as a buffet.

Share

NaNoWriMo and Me

For those not in the know NaNoWriMo stands for National Novel Writing Month and it started today November 1. It runs through the 30th and the people participating are attempting to write 50,000 during those 30 days.

Now that sounds like a lot and it is, but it is a doable goal with dedication and the willingness to chain your inner editor in the basement and let the words flow unimpeded. I have a number of writing friends taking part and I hope each and every one of them wins, hitting and exceeding their goal.

I am not taking part. I tried it once several years ago and it did not agree with my style of writing. That’s not to say it is bad, anything that gets the words on paper is generally a good thing. For me it really comes down to two things.

1) I have already gotten my self-discipline down where I can produce as needed. I have just finished my 8th novel and frankly it wasn’t hard. It has been more than 10 years since I started a novel without completing it. (That doesn’t mean the novels written in those ten years were all good. They weren’t, but they were all finished.)

2) My day-job hits it insane busy period right now. Luckily it is not retail sales who are also starting to see more and more work. (Hopefully) This is when the most applications come to my company and for me that means 10 hours a day 4 or 5 days a week and often half days on Saturday.

No tears. I get paid well and I am very happy doing it. But I am also happy that I finished my latest novel a few weeks ago and I have no writing pressure on me.

So good luck to those flying at the keyboards, I salute you.

Share

Halloween Horror Movie #10: Thirst (1979)

Here is the first film in this series that does not reside in my movie library. Sunday night as dinner was becoming close to ready my sweetie-wife suggested that she wanted to watch a horror with me that evening and in the end suggested we watch Thirst. Well, it was available to us via Shudder and it’s Amazon add-on (Part of a 7 day free trial – you gotta love those) and so soon I had it queued up on the Xbox 360.

1-thirst-1979Thirst comes to us by way of Australia’s exploitative movie cycle of the 1970’s and 1980s. The same period that gave us Mad Max and Razorback. An unusual entry into the vampire mythos Thirst reminded me  in one part of The Hunger and in another way of the Australian film Daybreakers.

Thirst about a secret society of vampires living and thriving in our global community. What sets this masquerade story apart from many others is that these vampires are wholly without a supernatural aspect. They are people who discovered centuries ago that health and life can be obtained by drinking healthy blood. The secret society has established farm where blood-cows (that’s you, me, and the rest of humanity) are raised and cared for to provide a clean product. The plot of the film is the discovery of the descendent from one of the founding noble families. For reasons never truly explained the society is hell-bent on bring this lost lamb back into their fold. What follows is a story of psychological torture and a contest of wills.

Thirst was interesting but on a sort of watch it one time sort of manner. My sweetie-wife had seen the film many years ago and this time around found it dull and boring. As with all things artistic your mileage may vary. I do not regret the 90 minutes watching this unusual film.

Share

The Zombie Apocalypse Doesn’t Work

Sorry fellow zombie movies fans but the Zombie Apocalypse as seen in films like Dawn of the Dead just is not credible. Setting aside the issue of dead bodies reanimating, that’s the gimme you have to accept for the setting premise, the hordes of undead overrunning civilization just isn’t going to happen, A friend and I ran these numbers twenty years with much lower level of access to data set and now with the wonders of the internet I can really find data to work with on this subject. My data is pulled from the CDC statistics from 2014 and is applied to the city of Los Angeles.

Way out in the country where did all these bodies come from?

Way out in the country where did all these bodies come from?

In the USA the rate of death is 823.7 person per 100,000 of population per year. Divide that by 365.25 and you get a daily rate of 2.25 per 100,000 population. L.A. has a population of 4,030,904 giving it an average death rate of 90.69 deaths per day. As you can see we are already seriously deficient in potential zombies. However lets say the anomaly that reanimates the bodies effect all bodies 3 days dead and less. That produces a potential zombie horde of 272.08 units. Now if you simply divided them out by the land area of L.A. (469 square miles) you end up with 1 zombie every 1.72 square miles, but people don’t die even distributed throughout a major metropolitan city. Again taking data from the CDC we can say in rough number that:

37% die while under in patient care (Hospitals)

30 % die at home

19% in long term care or nursing homes

7% at the ER or urgent care.

7% other or unknown.

Of that 3 day total I would spitball – and this is entirely my guess take it as you will – that 90% of those who died at Hospitals, Urgent Cares, Nursing Homes and the like will be bagged, tagged, and either buried or in secure storage. I’m going to be cynical and say only 80% for those who died at home and I’ll be really generous to the future zombie horde and let them have all of the other or unknown. So if we run with those percentages how many free range zombies do we have to threaten the vast population of the City of the Angeles?

52.5 Zombies.

To make matters a little worse… 29.93 of those zombies will be aged 75 or older. Nearly all will start off in buildings already designed and ready for emergencies except the 19.04 that dies in unknown and other locations. In my opinion if you want to have a credible Zombie Apocalypse you need a massive die off in conjunction with the reanimation.

Share

Halloween Horror Movie #9: The Vampire Lovers 1970

Okay, I’ll fess up that this one is a bit of a cheat, but only a bit. Last night I started watching a different film but working OT at the day-job apparently had hit me fairly solidly and before 10pm, and that’s early for me, I found myself unable to keep my eyes focused. So today I will write about a film I watched for the first time earlier this month.
In an earlier post I referred to Hammer Studios approach to horror films as being Bloodshed and Bosoms. This really kicked in with their production of The Curse of Frankenstein starring Peter Cushing as the immoral Frankenstein and Christopher Lee as the creature. Where Universal Studios avoided explicit images of body part and organs Hammer presented them full frame, widescreen, and in color. Ladies wore low cut dresses and the combination of the grotesque and the titillating proved to be box office gold.

1-vampire_loversblucoverFast-forward to 1970 and the Hammer adaptation of the vampire story Carmilla. Like a drug addiction what shocked and titled last year produces a lesser effect this time around, so when we get over a decade into the cycle something more is needed to shock the box office.

The Vampire Lovers stars the incomparable Ingrid Pitt as Carmilla a vampire who plays the part of a young girl, she is supposed to be 16 or at least look like that but Pitt did not look like a teenager, whose plays upon the sympathies of others for shelter and protection, allowing her to hunt their young daughters as her victims. Being that this is 1970 and even on the other side of the Atlantic standards in film were rapidly changing. Hammer no longer happy with simply low cut gowns dives into nudity for titillation and a strong lesbian subtext for their shock value. Though honestly it’s not that deeply buried and it may be more accurate to call it text and not sub-text.

The film works overall and Pitt, thought hardly looking 16, delivers a nice performance as a vampire that more than a little conflicted. There are some variations on the vampire lore with new limitation and less super human abilities that make this film something more than simply a retelling of Dracula with the cast gender flipped.

This is a movie that my darling sweetie-wife had wanted to see for sometime, but it has rarely been available in the United States. Luckily there is a blu-ray release of the UK cut and it was less than $10, so I happily bought a copy so we could watch it together. The film is decent enough that I have no plans to see the disc used, but rather it will take its place in my library.

Share