Why Cal in Titanic is a Terrible Character

James Cameron, the filmmaker behind some of the most commercially successful movies of all time is a fantastically capable director and technician but as a writer I feel he is at best mediocre. An example of this is the character Caledon, Cal, Hockley (Billy Zane) from Cameron’s box office monster Titanic.

20th Century Fox

In the film, in case the plot, beyond the sinking of the vessel, escaped you, Rose (Kate Winslet) is engaged to wed Cal as a desperate maneuver to save her family following the death of her father who left them with crushing debts. This plan is crushed by Rose meeting Jack (Leonardo DiCaprio) with a love that turns out to be as doomed as the ship itself. Cal becomes the villain of the story, desperate to possess Rose, framing Jack for theft and chasing him around the sinking liner in the film’s final act.

At no point in the script does Cal display any trait or act that can even be close to being considered as noble or even fair minded. He is cruel and abusive to Rose, treats her as property, appears wholly uninterested in events that nearly took her life, and when she does leave him for Jack his only real concern and emotional involvement is about the loss of money due to the McGuffin jewel she has unwittingly taken with her.

With Cal depicted this despicably there is absolutely no tension in Rose’s relationship. She faces no serious choice, and it is doubtful that any audience member thought for a moment that she needed to honor her commitment to him. There is nothing, not even the prospect of financial ruin, that could generate any sense that she should do anything but flee from this monster of character, written with such little depth that he is better suited to some poorly animated cartoon where he can have a mustache to twirl. At no point in the entire film is Cal ever right. He proclaims, in blasphemous terms, the ship unsinkable and is of course too dull and stupid to see the emotional power of art. Even with Rose’s financial disaster, one that is purely hypothetical in terms of screentime, it is inconceivable that she would bind herself to this man. There are many rich bachelors in the world, and one does not need to choose an abuser, one who is abusive prior to the wedding, for salvation. Cal’s poorly constructed nature as a character seriously erodes all credibility in the story itself, making it into melodrama instead of drama.

Share

2 thoughts on “Why Cal in Titanic is a Terrible Character

  1. Bob Evans Post author

    More evidence than that. The scene at breakfast where he throws the table aside he makes it plain that she was his wife in deed if not in law yet. Now, I don;t wholly agree that it was out of period. t wouldn’t have been publicly acknowledged but sex is always happening. I read the biography of Robert A Heinlein and about the same period in his diary he lamented that in high school everyone seemed to be having sex but himself. Certainly as Cal is presented in the movie I can see him saying to have a marriage proposal Rose has to bend to his will in every instance.

  2. Missy

    Oh, I TOTALLY agree!

    I love Zane’s work – but this character is utterly forgettable and utterly irredeemable.

    The other thing that was off-putting to me was that there was evidence that he and Rose were sexually intimate prior to the wedding – note the adjoining staterooms.

    Yeah. That wouldn’t have happened, either. It would have ruined her reputation as a bride and risked an out-of-wedlock pregnancy. That class didn’t play about such things as lineage and inheritance.

    It’s sad that the film was so off the mark in the social aspects of society.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.