I don’t mean arguments that intent or by accident become terribly humorous, but rather arguments that are expressed in terms of hysteria, usually by overt and terribly applied hyperbole.
I get a lot of political discussions with my friends and family. (Almost never with anyone else because it’s too volatile a subject to broach with people I don’t know well.) It doesn’t matter if it comes from the left or from the right, I am often treated to some wildly over the top hyperbole about the evils of the enemy.
Bush is a fascist.
Obama is a communist.
You know the drill. These arguments can really bug me because they show such an utter disregard for the truth and for the language. In the early 90’s Rush Limbaugh used to say quite a bit on his show that ‘words mean things.’ Oh that is something I can get behind very strongly. The first casualty in any heated political argument seem to be the English language. (I assume it true for other languages, but as I speak and read no other, I’ll stick with English.)
Something else that has occurred to me recently is that the more hyperbole that is used, the more it strikes me that someone is panicking about their position. That this feels like the rearguard action of a collapsing front. It not only is unpersuasive it makes your argument feel weaker, no matter the truth that may lay under your position.
This little rant by myself won’t change a thing. No one I know uses the hyperbole as a conscious tactic, and as such they will continue to lob them like errant grenades, but I wanted to get my thoughts out there.

the producers, writers, and director all felt that this was a comic superhero film. (Hence the appeared of several issues of ROM space knight, a forgettable Marvel book from the 80’s.)
with latex to make him look merged with the machine, the image is disturbing. We can emotionally feel Murphy’s loss of humanity. When he says he can feel his lost family but he can not remember them, it strikes home as true.
the suit.
does it mean to be devout, it found itself measured as product and summarily sentenced to butchering before release. Tossed out to die an ignoble and forgotten death then film slowly built a following. From the strange images, the non-cinematic score, and the brutal inescapable ending, the film became legend.  Interest grew, interested in perhaps the director’s original vision, not subject to an executive’s callous command to cut fifteen minutes and he didn’t care which. The birth of conspiracy, when it was discovered that all the original negatives had somehow inadvertently been used as landfill in building a highway. All of this merged into a strange and almost unbelievable history for a simple low budget horror film.
simply it never was around in a form for me to watch at the time and place where I had an interest. I had seen scenes and I had even seen the closer couple of shoots, but never the entire film, and certainly never in one go from front to back. It is an interesting experience, particularly from a position 40 years after it was released, and after it had spawned a franchise of its own.