Asinine Political Writing

From One Jonah Goldberg

Let me say up front, I don’t think President Obama is to blame for the Fort Hood shootings, and I don’t think it’s fair to say otherwise.

But (you knew there had to be a “but”) that doesn’t mean Obama won’t pay a political price for Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan’s rampage.

At first blush, it seems distasteful to take a political yardstick to the pain suffered at Fort Hood. But if we are to consider this incident part of the bloody tapestry of the larger war on terror, there’s no way to separate it from politics. After all, the war on terror has been driving politics in America for the better part of a decade now.

And that might offer insight into why so many are eager to make the massacre a story about the psychological breakdown of a man who just happened to be a Muslim. . . .

For instance, it seems likely that Obama has already suffered a rhetorical defeat. Whatever his faults, President Bush got to say one thing that the American people always appreciated: After 9/11, he kept us safe from a terrorist attack on the homeland. If Hasan acted as a jihadist terrorist and not a disgruntled psychiatrist, Obama can’t even make the same claim about his first year in office.

There is so much that is wrong with what was written by Mr. Goldberg in the above excerpt.  To bring up an opponent’s possible political cost from such a horrendous crime is the kind of tack left to propagandist and not any form of serious thinker or writer.

If this was an example of Islamic terrorism  since 9-11, then you can’t really say that Bush 43 kept us safe and prevented all attacks on US soil after 9-11 either. John A, Muhammad, the DC sniper from 2002, was convicted and recently put to death for acts of terrorism within the united States.

All seven justices agreed that Mr. Muhammad’s conviction under a previously untested terrorism law was appropriate. The law dispenses with the triggerman requirement in cases where the killing was “pursuant to the direction or order” of someone engaged in an act of terrorism. (NY Times April 23 2005)


What takes this sentiment of Mr. Goldberg’s into lunacy is that reflect on the Obama administration. As though Major Hasan would not have snapped in the same way had John McCain and the Goddess been elected in 2008. (There is no ideology save Conservatism and Palin is it profit. Blessed is her flirt and may peace be upon her.) In all likelihood this would have happened exactly the same way and then of course there would be silence from Mr. Goldberg about how this reflected poorly on the president.

Share

2 thoughts on “Asinine Political Writing”

  1. Profit was chosen. she’s a money making machine for herself and for candidates. as for 9-11 and Bush. Why don;t you know it was the fault of Clinton, Bush inherited the problem. However Obama did not inherit problems those are his. (This is line take by those on the right – consider it as seriously as it deserves.)

  2. Uh, did you really mean “profit” or “prophet”? I could see this either way, depending upon market forces… (joke intended.)

    Spot on commentary as usual. The real extension of what Mr. Goldberg is saying is that President Bush is in some way responsible for the atacks on 9/11. After all, they happened during his (Mr. Bush’s) presidency, after he’d been in office some months, therefor were his policies not responsible? Does he really want to go there?

Comments are closed.