A Proposal

Or possibly more like a notion.

I think we are watching the disintegration of the primary system for selecting candidates for President of the United States of America. The primary system itself, as we know it today, is a rather recent development. It truly started with 1968 and the Democratic Party trying to making the process more responsive to popular opinion and the voters. Watergate in the early 70s accelerated the reforms and both parties adopted a system where they hold elections to see who’s going to stand in the election. On the face of it the system looks sound. candidates campaign, as tested int he waters of an actual election, and the people can votes based upon who they agree with the most.

As we can see this cycle, and in previous cycles, that is not reality. Candidates jump in who have no intention of winning the primary but rather developing support bases for further financial gain. Once that pays off it encourage more of the same, candidates vying for base votes play to the most fanatical elements of their own parties, sounding more and more extreme and reaping rewards for such actions.

Before the primary system, the Convention is where the candidate was selected. It was a time of smoke-filled rooms and party bosses calling the shots, but it was mercifully short and tended to produce stable competent candidates.  Convention today are coronations more about spectacle than policy. How could we devise a system that selects the best of both worlds, voter input and party competency?

Here’s an idea, just a spitball off the top of my head concept.

Retain primaries, make them closed, (after all this about selecting the party’s face and that should be restricted to party members.) but remove individual candidates. Instead politicians or just folk run election trying to gather votes for factions. The factions are awarded the delegates and at the convention the factions, using their delegates, vote and select the standard-bearers for the party. Factions could raise money, unlimited money in fact, but at the end of the primary all excess monies go to the party for the general election. Politicians who stumped for the faction would certain have a leg up on getting the nomination but if they stumbled or embarrassed themselves or the party they’d be plenty of time and ability to move to a better candidate. Because the money went to the factions and not an individual person, there would be less emotional blackmail associated with massive donations reducing the corrupting effects. This would also open up a party to greater inclusion as it would be unlikely that a single faction would amass a majority of delegates right off and a nominee could only be picked by consensus.

Remember that the current primary system is not part of our system of government. It is not dictated by the laws of the land, it is the rule by which a party selects its candidate. It’s a recently developed method and I think it’s unstable. (Trump)

 

Share

2 thoughts on “A Proposal

  1. brian sack

    Question: what’s the difference between Donald Trump and God?
    GOD: I don’t believe I’m Donald Trump or a fighter pilot.
    Trump: I’m a business man and God isn’t. He gives away his book. I sell my book, “The Art of the Deal”, written by me, Donald Trump and it spent many months on the New York Times Best Seller List.
    God: It’s not that kind of book. It’s a philosophy of life, how you treat others and wish to be treated yourself.
    Trump: No wonder you’re losing market share to these other loser religions. Buddha should contemplate seeing his toes again. You’re losing to Islam, a religion that doesn’t let you drink or have pork. How can you have a nice brunch without bacon and a mimosa?
    God: Orthodox Jews don’t eat pork.
    Trump: I like the Jews. I will carry 100% of the Jewish vote. Lots of Jews work or me, mostly in accounting and legal.
    God: Religion is not a business.
    Trump: It should be. The book of revelations should reveal the price of the other books. and you can have some tech guys write up an app of the Ten Commandments. You can download one or all ten, or just the ones you want to obey.
    God: ow would you deal with Isis?
    Trump: I would get Isis to fund their own demise by getting together several Christian nations in Europe and go in and wipe out Isis and Islam and pay for with their oil.
    God: We tried that.
    Trump: And I would do a much better job of branding. You know the Muslims have that half moon thing on the mosques, we put it on outhouse doors, but we all know what it means. You don’t have big G on the church. You have a cross, which looks like a stylized T.
    God: God is not an elective office.
    Trump: Too bad because I would make a terrific god.

Comments are closed.